Newsletters
The United States has provided formal notice to the Russian Federation on June 17, 2024, to confirm the suspension of the operation of paragraph 4 of Article 1 and Articles 5-21 and 23 of the Conven...
The IRS has announced plans to deny tens of thousands of high-risk Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims while beginning to process lower-risk claims. The agency's review has identified a sign...
The IRS has issued a warning about the increasing threat of impersonation scams targeting seniors. These scams involve fraudsters posing as government officials, including IRS agents, to steal s...
The IRS released the inflation adjustment factors and the resulting applicable amounts for the clean hydrogen production credit for 2023 and 2024.For 2023, the inflation adjustment...
The IRS has released the inflation adjustment factor for the credit for carbn dioxide (CO2) sequestration under Code Sec. 45Q for 2024. The inflation adjustment factor is 1.3877, and the...
The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) may continue to implement an alternative communication method, which allows taxpayers to receive notifications via preferred electronic methods when a notice, ...
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) published a Small Entity Compliance Guide to assist the small business community in complying with the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting rule. Starting in 2024, many entities created in or registered to do business in the United States are required to report information about their beneficial owners—the individuals who ultimately own or control a company—to FinCEN. The Guide is intended to help businesses determine if they are required to report their beneficial ownership information to FinCEN.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) published a Small Entity Compliance Guide to assist the small business community in complying with the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting rule. Starting in 2024, many entities created in or registered to do business in the United States are required to report information about their beneficial owners—the individuals who ultimately own or control a company—to FinCEN. The Guide is intended to help businesses determine if they are required to report their beneficial ownership information to FinCEN.
“This guide is the latest in our ongoing efforts to educate the public about these important new requirements,” said Andrea Gacki, Director of FinCEN. “We are committed to making this process as simple as possible, particularly for small businesses.”
“This is also a critical step towards implementing the Corporate Transparency Act, which will help the Treasury Department and FinCEN expose bad actors abusing the U.S. financial system by hiding their identity behind opaque corporate structures,” said Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian Nelson.
The Guide is now available on FinCEN’s beneficial ownership information reporting webpage.
Among other things, the Guide:
- Describes each of the BOI reporting rule’s provisions in simple, easy-to-read language;
- Answers key questions; and
- Provides interactive checklists, infographics, and other tools to assist businesses in complying with the BOI reporting rule.
The requirements became effective on January 1, 2024, and companies are now able to report beneficial ownership information to FinCEN at this time. Small businesses can continue to monitor FinCEN’s website for more information.
By Jeff Stimpson April 01, 2024
Four years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Internal Revenue Service's Criminal Investigation division has investigated 1,644 tax and money laundering cases related to fraud around pandemic relief programs worth potentially $8.9 billion.
Four years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Internal Revenue Service's Criminal Investigation division has investigated 1,644 tax and money laundering cases related to fraud around pandemic relief programs worth potentially $8.9 billion.
As of the end of February, 795 persons had been indicted and 373 sentenced to an average of 34 months in prison. During the last four years, the IRS has obtained a 98.5% conviction rate in prosecuted COVID fraud cases.
"In the last year alone, we have opened nearly 700 new COVID fraud investigations that collectively add up to $5 billion in potential fraud," added CI chief Guy Ficco. "Our special agents continue to seek out fraudsters who stole money from government loan programs for their personal gain."
"The work by IRS Criminal Investigation plays a vital role in protecting against fraud and serves a key part in the agency's wider efforts to ensure fairness in the nation's tax system," said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel in a statement.
By Michael Cohn April 15, 2024
The Internal Revenue Service reported stronger performance on Monday, April 15, as it concluded this year's tax filing season, saying it had answered 1 million more phone calls from taxpayers and helped 170,000 people in person compared to last year.
The Internal Revenue Service reported stronger performance on Monday, April 15, as it concluded this year's tax filing season, saying it had answered 1 million more phone calls from taxpayers and helped 170,000 people in person compared to last year.
The IRS has been improving its technology and taxpayer service, thanks to the extra boost in funding from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. The agency said it received 75 million more visits to its IRS.gov site, driven by improvements to its "Where's My Refund?" tool that provided more details about refund status and notifications about when the IRS needs more information. The website had nearly 500 million visits, an 18% jump over last year.
The "Where's My Refund?" tool received over 275 million of those visits, up 62 million from 2023 for a 29% increase. The IRS also began testing a free tax program called Direct File in 12 states, and the agency reported Monday that it met its goal of enabling 100,000 taxpayers to successfully file their returns using the new program.
"Taxpayers continued to see major improvements from the IRS during the 2024 tax season," said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel in a statement Monday. "A well-funded IRS is like night and day for taxpayers. With the help of more funding and added resources, service for taxpayers this filing season eclipsed levels seen during the past decade. This tax season meant real-world improvements for people looking for help, whether calling, visiting in-person or using IRS.gov."
The IRS is hoping to protect as much of its funding as it can. The extra $80 billion over 10 years designated under the IRA has already been reduced by about $20 billion after a deal last year to raise the debt limit, with most of the cuts targeting tax enforcement.
Through April 6, the IRS processed more than 100 million individual tax returns. Tens of millions more will come in advance of the April deadline, the busiest time of the year for tax returns. The agency also projects about 19 million taxpayers will file extensions, which will be due Oct. 15.
Since the start of the January tax season, the IRS has delivered more than $200 billion in refunds through early April. The average refund was $3,011, a 4.6% increase from last April's average of $2,878.
The IRS added 5,000 new telephone assistors last year, and the level of service on its main phone lines exceeded 88%. That's above the 84% level seen last year and over five time better than during the pandemic, when the level of service dropped to just 15% in 2022.
The IRS answered more taxpayer calls on its live assistor lines this year, a 16.8% increase from 2023. Agency assistors handled 7,608,000 calls, up from 6,513,000 the year before. Automated lines handled another approximately 7 million calls, 280,000 more than the previous year. Taxpayers waited, on average, just over three minutes for help on the IRS main phone lines. That's down from four minutes in 2023 and 28 minutes in filing season 2022.
The tax agency provided callback options on 97% of its phone lines this filing season, and offered callback for over 4 million taxpayers, more than double the 1.8 million calls in 2023. This option, offered when phone lines were busy, saved taxpayers nearly 1.4 million hours of wait time on the phones.
Taxpayers certainly needed help from the IRS: The National Taxpayers Union Foundation also released on Tax Day its annual tax complexity study, using the latest IRS data to estimate the compliance and time burdens associated with filing income taxes. The numbers are enormous: Americans have spent 6.5 billion hours preparing their income tax returns, with an "opportunity cost" of the time spent laboring over taxes exceeding $280 billion for preparation alone. The average American individual income tax return now requires nine hours to complete.
By Jeff Stimpson January 10, 2024
The Internal Revenue Service has substantially improved taxpayer services and has good plans for improvement, but it continues to struggle with such problems as paper processing, response times for tax professionals, and ID theft and the Employee Retention Credit conundrum, according to the 2023 Annual Report to Congress from National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins.
"Overall, the magnitude of successes exceeded the areas of weakness in 2023, and most metrics showed significant improvement from the depths of the [COVID-19] pandemic," Collins writes in the report's preface. The report adds that the IRS virtually eliminated its backlog of unprocessed original [1040s] and substantially improved telephone service."
Still, problems remain.
By Jeff Stimpson January 10, 2024
The Internal Revenue Service has substantially improved taxpayer services and has good plans for improvement, but it continues to struggle with such problems as paper processing, response times for tax professionals, and ID theft and the Employee Retention Credit conundrum, according to the 2023 Annual Report to Congress from National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins.
"Overall, the magnitude of successes exceeded the areas of weakness in 2023, and most metrics showed significant improvement from the depths of the [COVID-19] pandemic," Collins writes in the report's preface. The report adds that the IRS virtually eliminated its backlog of unprocessed original [1040s] and substantially improved telephone service."
Still, problems remain.
- Kryptonite. The IRS received more than 11 million individual returns and 15 million business returns on paper last year.
"When I released the National Taxpayer Advocate's 2020 report, I wrote that the IRS in most cases 'can effectively handle whatever it can automate,' and when I released our 2021 report, I wrote that, 'Paper is the IRS's kryptonite,'" Collins said. "Those observations continued to hold true in 2023." - Headline news. At the end of FY23, nearly half a million taxpayers with cases pending in the IRS Identity Theft Victims Assistance unit (many of them low-income taxpayers) were also waiting an average of almost 19 months for the agency to resolve their problems. "If it weren't for the significant number of challenges affecting larger groups of taxpayers, this would be headline news, and it should be," Collins writes.
- 'Overage' and out. Despite the IRS eliminating its overhang of paper-filed 1040s, backlogs in processing Forms 1040-X, amended business tax returns and correspondence continued. At the end of calendar 2019 (the most recent pre-pandemic year), the report said, the IRS backlog of unprocessed amended returns was 500,000. The backlog as of late October 2023 was 1.9 million. Taxpayer correspondence and related cases more than doubled over the same period, to 4.3 million. The percentage of "overage" correspondence cases in 2023 reached its highest level in recent years: Nearly 70% of pending cases exceeded normal processing times as of late October.
- Hurry up and wait. The report attributes much of the paper inventory backlog to the Treasury Department's decision to prioritize answering telephone calls over processing amended returns and correspondence, meaning that IRS customer service representatives were "simply sitting around waiting for the phone to ring."
During the 2023 filing season alone, CSRs spent 1.27 million hours (34% of their time) waiting to receive calls. That translates to more than 650 unproductive staff years in which these employees could have been processing paper and reducing response times for amended returns and correspondence.
"The IRS cannot easily shuffle employees back and forth between answering phones and processing correspondence, so unproductive employee time was the price it had to pay to improve telephone service levels," Collins writes. - Professional liability. The report adds that service for tax pros was below average, with an average wait time of 16 minutes. "Roughly 500,000 tax professionals prepare tax returns for more than 85 million taxpayers, so the IRS derives considerable benefit from working collaboratively with the pool of tax professionals," the report says. "Requiring tax professionals to call back repeatedly and wait on hold not only inconveniences them but often results in additional costs to taxpayers for the time their tax professionals bill for waiting on hold."
- Credit crunch. Employers who file eligible Employee Retention Credit claims are often waiting six months or longer to receive their credits or refunds. TAS has received several thousand ERC cases, and some have involved nonprofit organizations that provide medical or other critical services and are depending on ERC refunds to stay afloat. As of early December, the IRS had a backlog of approximately 1 million ERC claims.
The report acknowledges the IRS is between a rock and a hard place in handling ERC claims. "If it pays claims quickly without adequate review, it could pay billions of dollars to nonqualifying persons. If it takes the time to review claims carefully, eligible employers will experience significant delays in receiving the credit, and in extreme cases, employers who need the funds immediately could go out of business," the report says.
What to do
The TAS suggests the IRS take several steps to address the biggest problem areas. Among them:- Improvement of online accounts for individual taxpayers, business taxpayers and tax pros should be the highest priority. During 2023, individual taxpayers filed more than 160 million income tax returns, yet only 16.8 million users accessed individual online accounts.
- Improve the ability to attract, hire and retain qualified employees. The report says the IRS continues to struggle to hire qualified candidates in many key areas. It says three of the main reasons are failure to advertise positions to the optimal target audience by job series, the slow pace of the hiring process and non-competitive pay.
- Upgrade the back end of the "Document Upload Tool" to fully automate the processing of taxpayer correspondence. The IRS has created and implemented the DUT to allow taxpayers to upload documents electronically in response to an IRS notice, letter, telephone conversation or visit. Once the documents reach the IRS, though, they're still processed as if they came in on paper.
- Enable all taxpayers to e-file their federal tax returns. About 150 to 200 IRS forms still are not eligible for e-filing.
To our business clients.
WITHHOLDING FROM EMPLOYEES' PAYCHECKS:
1a. Social Security - The employee portion of this tax remains at 6.2% with a wage limit of $168,600. The employer’s portion of Social Security for 2024 also remains at 6.2%, on wages up to $168,600.
1b. Medicare - The employee and employer each pay 1.45% and there is no cap on the amount of payroll which will be subject to this total tax of 2.9%. Because of the unlimited ceiling on Medicare, there is no maximum tax deduction.
Generally, payroll deposits will include 15.3% of wages (6.2% times 2, plus 1.45% times 2) on wages up to $168,600, and 2.9% of all wages thereafter. However, there is an additional Medicare withholding of 0.9% on employees earning over $200,000, or $250,000 if married filing joint. So the employee’s normal Medicare tax rate of 1.45%, will rise to 2.35% on their earnings over $200,000 or $250,000 depending on filing status, but the employer still pays only the 1.45% rate.
2. The rate for self-employment persons will be 15.3% on wages up to $168,600. The Medicare tax of 2.9% continues on amounts over $168,600. Self-employed people earning over $200,000 and those earning over a combined $250,000 on a joint return will also face the additional .9% Medicare tax. Because the Medicare tax applies to all earnings, there is no maximum self-employment tax. (There is a deduction allowed for self-employed persons for both self-employment tax and income tax computations).
3. Federal and State Income Tax - The amount of withholding will change for both Federal and State effective January 1, 2024. Please see the updated federal Employer’s Tax Guide Publication 15 (Circular E) on the Internal Revenue Service website at: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p15.pdf and the California Employment Development Department’s Publication DE 44 at: https://edd.ca.gov/siteassets/files/pdf_pub_ctr/de44.pdf.
4. State Disability Insurance - The rate will change to 1.1 %, and there is no longer a cap on the amount of payroll which will be subject to this tax.
EMPLOYER TAXES PAID QUARTERLY:
- Federal Unemployment Tax - The 2024 federal unemployment tax rate is .6% on the first $7,000.
- State Unemployment Insurance and Employment Training Tax - The wage limit will remain at $7,000. Rates are set individually for employers. You will receive a notice of your 2024 rate in the mail or it can be accessed in your EDD e-Services for Business account. Please send a copy of any notice you receive to your payroll report preparer.
2024 FEDERAL PAYROLL DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS:
Federal Payroll Tax Deposits must follow the monthly or semi-weekly deposit method assigned to each employer by the IRS. The IRS will send a notice if your status changed from 2023; however, the employer is ultimately responsible for determining which deposit schedule actually applies. If you didn’t receive an IRS notice, you can make your own determination as shown below:
- An employer’s status as a monthly or semi-weekly depositor should be known before the beginning of each calendar year and is determined annually. This determination is based on the amount of employment taxes the employer reported on the four quarterly reports for the 12-month period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
- Employers who accumulated less than $2,500 of employment taxes during a quarter are only required to make a deposit at the end of the quarter. They can pay their payroll taxes with the quarterly form.
- Employers who report $50,000 or less of employment taxes (taxes withheld from the employee plus the employer portion) during the 12-month period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, and all new employers, will be monthly depositors. The deposits will be due the 15th of the following month. NOTE: These deposits will have to be made electronically (see below).
- Employers who reported more than $50,000 of employment taxes during the 12-month period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, will be semi-weekly depositors. The deposits will be required on or before either Wednesday or Friday, depending on the timing of the payroll. Semi-weekly depositors will still have at least three banking days after a payday to make the deposit. NOTE: These deposits will have to be made electronically (see below).
Under the semi-weekly rule, the payroll taxes withheld plus the employer’s portion of the FICA/Medicare on payrolls which were paid on Wednesday, Thursday or Friday must be deposited by the following Wednesday. Payroll taxes, accumulated for a payroll period, which were paid on Saturday through Tuesday must be deposited by the following Friday. Remember, your deposit will be due either on a Wednesday or Friday. - Employers who accumulate $100,000 of employment taxes during a monthly or semi-weekly period are required to deposit those taxes by the next banking day. Once you make a next-banking-day deposit, you automatically become a semi-weekly depositor for the remainder of that calendar year and the following calendar year.
FEDERAL ELECTRONIC DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS FOR 2024:
Employers must use the IRS’ EFTPS for making tax payments. There is an exception for employers with a deposit liability of less than $2,500 for a return period. These employers can remit employment taxes with their quarterly or annual return.
If you are required to use EFTPS for your Federal tax deposits and fail to do so, you may be subject to a 10% penalty. For deposits made by EFTPS to be considered on time, you must initiate the transaction at least one business day before the date the deposit is due. If you are new to EFTPS you will need to allow seven (7) days to get your pin number and complete your account set-up.
You may voluntarily participate in the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System even if you are not required to do so.
To get more information or to enroll in EFTPS, call 1-800-555-4477, or visit the EFTPS web site at www.eftps.gov.
EMPLOYER’S QUARTERLY FEDERAL TAX RETURN, FORM 941
Each quarter’s wages subject to income tax, social security and/or Medicare taxes must be reported on Form 941. This form must be filed even if you have no taxes to report. Any employment taxes totaling less than $2,500 for the period and not previously deposited for the quarter can be paid with the report.
Due dates for 2024 employment tax deposits are April 30, July 31, and October 31, 2024, and January 31, 2025, for the previous quarter. If all taxes have been deposited when due, and no tax is being paid with the return, an additional ten days is allowed to file the return. Late returns are subject to penalties on any unpaid tax due with the return.
2024 STATE PAYROLL TAX DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS:
These deposits are required to be paid electronically. The depositing requirements are described below:
- State deposit due dates are generally the same as federal deposit due dates.
- Employers who are required to make federal monthly deposits and have accumulated $350 to $500 of undeposited state income tax withholding, are required to deposit all State Income Tax and State Disability Insurance withholding using the federal monthly deposit schedule.
- Employers who deposit semi-weekly for federal purposes and have accumulated more than $500 of undeposited state income tax withholding are required to deposit all State Income Tax and State Disability Insurance withholding to the Employment Development Department using the federal semi-weekly deposit schedule.
- Employers, who accumulate $100,000 of federal employment taxes, and more than $500 of state withholding taxes, must deposit all State Income Tax and State Disability Insurance withholding by the next banking day. Once you make a next banking day deposit, you automatically become a semi-weekly depositor for the remainder of that calendar year and the following calendar year.
- If you accumulate more than $350 of state withholding taxes in a month or in the cumulative of two or more months, but are not required to make a federal monthly deposit, you are still required to deposit all State Income Tax and State Disability Insurance withheld by the 15th of the following month. Any withholding which is not required to be deposited based on the above will be due on April 30 , July 31, and October 31, 2024 or January 31, 2025 for the preceding quarter.
- State Unemployment Insurance (SUI) and Employment Training Tax (ETT) must be deposited at least quarterly.
A penalty of 15% plus interest will be charged on late payroll tax payments.
CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS:
e-Services for Business can be used to electronically submit all tax payments, wage reports and employment tax returns. Register at https:/www.edd.ca.gov/eServices or contact the Taxpayer Assistance Center at 1-888-745-3886.
STATE WAGE AND WITHHOLDING REPORTS:
Employers file two quarterly reports, the DE 9 and DE 9C. These reports must be filed by April 30, July 31, and October 31, 2024, and January 31, 2025 for the previous quarter, even if you don’t have payroll during a quarter. A wage item penalty of $20.00 per employee will be charged for late or unreported employee wages. On these reports, be sure to include the full first name, not just the first initial.
The DE 9 and DE 9C forms must be filed on-line together using e-Services for Business.
STATE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW OR RE-HIRED EMPLOYEES:
All employers are required to report the full name, social security number, home address and start-of-work date of each employee within twenty days of the start-of-work date.
Form DE 34, Report of New Employees, is used to report new employees. The information may be filed online through e-Services for Business (edd.ca.gov/eServices), faxed to the EDD at 1-916-319-4400, or mailed to:
Employment Development Department
Document Management Group, MIC 96
P.O. Box 997016
West Sacramento, CA 95799-7016
The reporting of new employees is required for all newly hired employees, employees rehired or returning to work from a furlough, separation, leave of absence without pay, or termination. If a returning employee was not formally terminated or removed from payroll records and is returning after less than sixty consecutive days, you don’t need to report the employee as a rehire.
STATE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS:
Businesses are required to report specific independent contractor information to the EDD if the following statements all apply:
- You will be required to file a 2024 Form 1099-NEC for the services performed by the independent contractor.
- You pay the independent contractor $600 or more OR enter into a contract for $600 or more.
- The independent contractor is an individual or sole proprietorship.
If all the above statements apply, you must report the independent contractor to the EDD within 20 days of paying/contracting for $600 or more in services. You are not required to report independent contractors that are corporations, general partnerships, limited liability partnerships, and limited liability companies. Form DE 542, Report of Independent Contractor(s), is used. The information may be filed online through e-Services for Business (edd.ca.gov/eServices), faxed to the EDD at 1-916-319-4410, or mailed to:
Employment Development Department
Document Management Group, MIC 96
P.O. Box 997350
Sacramento, CA 95899-7350
* * * * *
While we’ll try to inform you of any additional changes made during 2024, please be vigilant yourself and also seek out information on changes from your payroll processors.
If you need assistance in preparing your payroll checks or have other questions relating to these taxes, please call.
STANDARD MILEAGE RATES FOR 2024
For 2024, the standard rate for business mileage will be 67 cents per mile. The previous rate was 65.5 cents per mile.
The standard rate for the use of a car when providing services to a charitable organization will remain at 14 cents per mile.
The 2024 standard mileage rate for the use of your car for medical expenses or deductible moving expenses will be 21 cents per mile. The previous rate was 22 cents per mile.
By Michael Cohn October 10, 2023
Even though the effective date of the new beneficial ownership rules under the Corporate Transparency Act is less than 90 days away, most businesses are either unaware of the reporting obligations they face or uncertain how they will comply.
A survey released Tuesday by Wolters Kluwer polled 669 U.S.-based companies, along with 328 law firms and accounting firms, about their general awareness of and readiness for complying with the CTA's new beneficial ownership rule. While the rule will apply to approximately half (51%) of the firms that participated in the survey, about three-quarters (74%) of those companies for which the CTA rule will be applicable indicated they only became aware of the rule by having taken the survey. Many respondents who are aware of the CTA were unsure (41%) whether the beneficial ownership rule, as implemented by FinCEN, would apply to them, despite their company's reporting status and revenue size.
By Michael Cohn October 10, 2023
Even though the effective date of the new beneficial ownership rules under the Corporate Transparency Act is less than 90 days away, most businesses are either unaware of the reporting obligations they face or uncertain how they will comply.
A survey released Tuesday by Wolters Kluwer polled 669 U.S.-based companies, along with 328 law firms and accounting firms, about their general awareness of and readiness for complying with the CTA's new beneficial ownership rule. While the rule will apply to approximately half (51%) of the firms that participated in the survey, about three-quarters (74%) of those companies for which the CTA rule will be applicable indicated they only became aware of the rule by having taken the survey. Many respondents who are aware of the CTA were unsure (41%) whether the beneficial ownership rule, as implemented by FinCEN, would apply to them, despite their company's reporting status and revenue size.
Starting Jan. 1, 2024, most U.S. corporations, limited liability companies and U.S. operations of foreign companies will be required to report information about their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN (see story). The requirements were part of the Corporate Transparency Act of 2021 in an effort to crack down on shell companies used for tax evasion and illicit trafficking, and the clock has been ticking on the approaching deadline. Now some are calling for a delay in the imminent requirements.
By Michael Cohn October 10, 2023
The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department released guidance on how buyers of electric vehicles can transfer their tax credits to automobile dealers and get advance payments that effectively lower the cost.
Under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, buyers of electric vehicles can opt to transfer their new clean vehicle credit of up to $7,500 and their previously owned clean vehicle credit of up to $4,000 to a car dealer starting Jan. 1, 2024. In effect, that will reduce the vehicle's purchase price by giving consumers an upfront down payment on their vehicle at the point of sale, as opposed to needing to wait to claim the credit on their tax return the following year. Only vehicles purchased under the consumer clean vehicle credits are eligible for the tax benefit.
By Michael Cohn October 10, 2023
The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department released guidance on how buyers of electric vehicles can transfer their tax credits to automobile dealers and get advance payments that effectively lower the cost.
Under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, buyers of electric vehicles can opt to transfer their new clean vehicle credit of up to $7,500 and their previously owned clean vehicle credit of up to $4,000 to a car dealer starting Jan. 1, 2024. In effect, that will reduce the vehicle's purchase price by giving consumers an upfront down payment on their vehicle at the point of sale, as opposed to needing to wait to claim the credit on their tax return the following year. Only vehicles purchased under the consumer clean vehicle credits are eligible for the tax benefit.
The guidance in Rev. Proc. 2023-33 also provides information on registration requirements and how the mechanics of the tax credit transfer will work for car dealers. The guidance also includes proposed eligibility rules for the previously owned clean vehicle credit that aim to give consumers extra certainty about their ability to claim and to transfer the credit, proposing to clarify that eligible consumers can transfer the full value of the new or previously owned vehicle credit regardless of their individual tax liability. The IRS also posted a frequently asked questions page with information on the transfer of new and previously owned clean vehicle credits from the taxpayer to an eligible entity for vehicles placed in service after Dec. 31, 2023. Fact Sheet 2023-22 updates FAQs related to new, previously owned and qualified commercial clean vehicles.
"For the first time, the Inflation Reduction Act allows consumers to reduce the upfront cost of a clean vehicle, expanding consumer choices and helping car dealers expand their businesses," said Laurel Blatchford, chief implementation officer for the Inflation Reduction Act at the Treasury Department, in a statement Friday. "The IRS has focused on streamlining this process for car dealers as part of its commitment to improving service and helping taxpayers claim the credits they are eligible for."
Later this month, dealers will be able to register through a new website called IRS Energy Credits Online. For buyers to be eligible to claim or transfer a tax credit starting Jan. 1, 2024, the dealer they purchase their vehicle from must first register with Energy Credits Online. The registration is also a requirement for dealers to offer consumers clean energy tax credits for qualifying products like electric vehicles. Starting in January, registered dealers can submit their sales information to the IRS and receive payment for the transferred tax credits. Dealers will also use Energy Credits Online to submit "time of sale" reports, which will confirm vehicles' eligibility for a credit, whether or not the buyer chooses to transfer the credit to the dealer.
When a buyer opts to transfer the credit, registered dealers will reduce the purchase price of the vehicle or provide cash to the buyer. The amount provided must equal the full amount of the credit available for the eligible vehicle. When completing the sale, the dealer will electronically send information about the transfer, including a time of sale report, to receive an advance payment for the value of the credit. The IRS anticipates it will be able to issue advance payments within 72 hours.
Tax audit problems
Separately, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration released a report Tuesday on problems with the IRS's faulty audit selection process for the EV tax credit.
The Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 originally created the Qualified Plug-In Electric Drive Motor Vehicle Credit, the report noted. The tax provision was later amended by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and then modified and extended under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and renamed the Clean Vehicle Credit. The credits of up to $7,500 help taxpayers offset the purchase of a qualifying plug-in electric drive motor vehicle. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated the credits will cost $5 billion from fiscal years 2022 through 2026, TIGTA noted.
In response to TIGTA's recommendations in a prior report, the IRS developed filters to identify returns with potentially erroneous Qualified Plug-In Electric Drive Motor Vehicle Credit claims. However, while the IRS has taken steps to address past recommendations, problems with the implementation of some of the filters have made the existing issues even worse. TIGTA's analysis found that 74% of the tax returns flagged by the filter to identify non-qualifying vehicle models flagged qualifying vehicle models in error, resulting in taxpayer burden and unproductive examinations.
In addition, due to issues with the filter, many claims for non-qualified vehicles were not examined. TIGTA identified 13,518 unexamined returns totaling approximately $63 million in credits potentially paid for unqualified vehicles. From 2019 through 2022, TIGTA identified 7,547 returns with credits totaling approximately $23 million that were over the allowable threshold but were not caught by IRS filters.
The inspector general made five recommendations in the report, urging the IRS to review the 13,518 claims for non-qualified vehicles identified by TIGTA for potential examination; to consider adding a manual review to the filter identifying non-qualifying vehicle models until future controls are in place; to expand the use of invalid VIN criteria as additional information in examination selection; to expand controls to identify partial credits; and to review the 7,547 claims that were over the allowed threshold for their vehicle model identified by TIGTA for potential examination.
The IRS agreed with four of the five recommendations and plans to review the identified claims, expand invalid vehicle identification number criteria for tax year 2023, and update its business rules to incorporate the legislative changes from the IRA related to claims made over the allowable threshold amounts. However, the IRS disagreed with manually reviewing Qualified Plug-In Electric Drive Motor Vehicle Credit claims when the vehicle is a non-qualifying vehicle.
"The IRS relies heavily on available data to identify and select cases in the most efficient manner, and these IRA provisions will allow the IRS to obtain vehicle data to identify noncompliance," wrote Lia Colbert, commissioner of the IRS's Small Business/Self-Employed Division, in response to the report. "For example, these IRA provisions all provide that no credit shall be allowed or determined unless the taxpayer includes a vehicle identification number of their vehicle on their tax return."
She noted that Congress also specifically modified the Tax Code to say that omitting a correct VIN from the tax return would constitute a "mathematical or clerical error," allowing the IRS to address it under its math error authority.
Every year, Americans donate billions of dollars to charity. Many donations are in cash. Others take the form of clothing and household items. With all this money involved, it's inevitable that some abuses occur. Current tax law cracks down on abuses by requiring that all donations of clothing and household items be in "good used condition or better."
Every year, Americans donate billions of dollars to charity. Many donations are in cash. Others take the form of clothing and household items. With all this money involved, it's inevitable that some abuses occur. Current tax law cracks down on abuses by requiring that all donations of clothing and household items be in "good used condition or better."
Good used or better condition
The law does not define good or better condition. For guidance, you can look to the standards that many charities already have in place. Many charities will not accept your donations of clothing or household items unless they are in good or better condition.
Clothing cannot be torn, soiled or stained. It must be clean and wearable. Many charities will reject a shirt with a torn collar or a jacket with a large tear in a sleeve. As one charity spokesperson summed it up, "Don't donate anything you wouldn't want to wear yourself."
Household items include furniture, furnishings, electronics, appliances, and linens, and similar items. Food, paintings, antiques, art, jewelry and collectibles are not household items. Household items must be in working condition. For example, a DVD player that does not work is not in good used or better condition. You can still donate it (if the charity will accept it) but you cannot claim a tax deduction. Household items, particularly furnishings and linens, must be clean and useable.
The law authorizes the IRS to deny a deduction for the contribution of a clothing or household item that has minimal monetary value. At the top of this list you can expect to find socks and undergarments.
Fair market value
You generally can deduct the fair market value of your donation. Unless your donation is new - for example, a blouse that has never been worn - its fair market value is not what you paid for it. Just like when you drive a new car off the dealer's lot, a new item loses value once you wear or use it. Therefore, its value is less than what you paid for it.
If you're not sure about an item's value, a reputable charity can help you determine its fair market value. Our office can also help you value your donations of used clothing and household items.
Get a receipt
Generally, you must obtain a receipt for your gift. If obtaining a receipt is impracticable, for example, you drop off clothing at a self-service donation center, you must maintain reliable written information about the contribution, such as the type and value of the property.
Charitable contributions of property of $250 or more must be substantiated by obtaining a contemporaneous written acknowledgement from the charity including an estimate of the value of the items. If your deduction for noncash contributions is greater than $500, you must attach Form 8283 to your tax return. Special rules apply if you are claiming a deduction of more than $5,000.
Exception
In some cases, the rules about good used or better condition do not apply. The restrictions do not apply if a deduction of more than $500 is claimed for the single clothing or household item and the taxpayer includes an appraisal with his or her return.
If you have any questions about the charitable contribution rules for donations of clothing and household items, give our office a call.
The following information should serve to remind you of how to calculate the value of the personal use of business-owned cars for W-2 purposes and how to withhold taxes on it:
The following information should serve to remind you of how to calculate the value of the personal use of business-owned cars for W-2 purposes and how to withhold taxes on it:
- For non-officer/shareholders: If commuting is the only personal use of a business-owned car allowed by an employer, then the employer would need to include $3 a day in the employee's wages to recognize the value of the commute, plus 5.5 cents/mile for the fuel provided by the employer.
For officers and shareholders: The personal use of a business-owned vehicle must be included in their W-2. The formula for computing the value of their personal use is as follows:
- Annual lease value based on the IRS table (see attached table) prorated for the number of months the vehicle was used from November 2023-October 2024.
- Times this value by the personal use percentage determined from mileage records maintained throughout the year which list business and personal miles driven.
- Then add the lesser of the actual cost, or 5.5 cents/mile, for gasoline provided by employer that was used for personal travel
- Next subtract any reimbursement that the employer receives from employee.
- The result is the value of the personal use of the business-owned vehicle to be included in employee's W-2 compensation.
or
(A x B) + (C - D) = E- It is possible to avoid income tax withholding on the value of the personal use of an employer-provided vehicle. However, early action was required in order to avoid withholding income tax for 2024. The employer must have notified the employee in writing by January 31, 2024 or within 30 days after receiving the vehicle during the year, in order to avoid income tax withholding on this fringe benefit. If the employee is not notified of the withholding election by the specified dates, the employer must withhold income taxes on the value included in the W-2. For 2025, the employee must be notified in writing by January 31, 2025 or within 30 days of receiving the vehicle, in order to avoid 2025 withholding on this fringe benefit.
Even though an employer can avoid withholding income tax on the value of the personal use of a vehicle (as described in item 3 above), the Social Security tax (FICA), the Medicare tax, and State Disability Insurance (SDI) must be withheld on the value included in the W-2. However, there are some choices available on the timing of these withholdings. The employer is given the option of calculating and withholding these taxes on a pay period, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual basis. As stated previously, the annual period would run from November through October, which means that the employer could wait until the end of October to figure the taxes to be withheld. If the employee will reach the maximum Social Security wages for the year by that time, without considering the fringe benefit, only Medicare tax withholding would be necessary.
Please feel free to contact us if you need help in calculating the value of the personal usage of business owned cars, but remember it must be calculated in time to be included on the 2024 W-2 forms.
Click here to view the Business Car Usage
With certain key exceptions, employers must pay nonunion, non-exempt employees (who are not working an alternative workweek schedule) at least time and one-half pay for: *Hours worked in excess of eight hours in one day, *Hours worked in excess of 40 hours in one workweek, and *The first eight hours worked on the seventh day of work in a given workweek.
In addition, employers must pay employees at least double time for any hours worked in excess of 12 hours in one day and hours worked in excess of eight hours on any seventh day of a workweek.
Under the new law compensatory time off in lieu of payment for hours worked by non-exempt employees in excess of the normal workday and workweek (as described above) is no longer permissible
Exceptions
Employees, who on July 1, 1999, were voluntarily working an alternate workweek schedule (adopted without an employee election), may continue to work that schedule, of not more than 10 hours work a day, and continue to be exempt from the overtime rules if the employer approves a written request by the employee to continue to work that schedule. In addition, employees may elect, by two-thirds vote, to work an alternative workweek of up to 10-hour work days within a 40-hour workweek without being subject to the overtime rules.
Personal Time Off
Employees may make up lost time due to a personal obligation by giving a signed, written request to an employer to make up the work. Please note however that, if an employer approves an employee's written request to make up work time that is lost as a result of a personal obligation, the hours of that makeup work time, if performed in the same workweek in which the time was lost, should not be counted toward computing the total number of hours worked in a day for purposes of the overtime pay requirements. The only exception would be in the case of an employee who works more than 11 hours in one day or 40 hours in one workweek.
All businesses are required to report independent contractors, to whom they will be issuing a 1099-MISC form, to the California Employment Development Department. The information provided will be forwarded to state and local child support agencies to help in their efforts to locate parents who are delinquent in their child support obligations.
The information must be reported to the EDD, using form DE 542 ("Report of Independent Contractors"), within twenty days of either entering a contract for $600 or more, or the date during the calendar year when total payments to the independent contractor reach $600. Form DE 542 requests the independent contractors' full name, social security number, address and the contract dates and amounts. You may obtain forms by calling the Employment Development Department at (916) 657-0529, accessing the EDD web site at www.edd.ca.gov, or contacting our office.
Only individuals working as independent contractors are to be reported. Thus, you don't need to report corporations or partnerships which you pay for services provided to your business. However, you must report all independent contractors you hire for $600 or more, regardless of whether the independent contractor lives or works in California or another state. You only need to report an independent contractor one time per each calendar year that you contract or pay the contractor $600 or more.
The completed DE 542 forms can be either mailed or faxed to the Employment Development Department. The mailing address is:Employment Development Department PO Box 997350 MIC 96 Sacramento, CA 95899-7350 And the fax number is: (916) 319-4410
The EDD may assess a $24 penalty for each failure to comply with the reporting requirements within the required time frame. Also, a penalty of $490 may be assessed for the failure to report the required information due to an agreement between you and the independent contractor to disregard the filing requirements.
California's state-run college saving program, Golden State Scholarshare Trust allows parents and others to put aside tax-deferred money for college.
Plan Features
Money that participants (parents, grandparents, businesses, etc.) contribute to the Scholarshare Trust will grow while in the participant's account and be tax free for federal and California purposes upon disbursement to the beneficiary's school of choice. The funds disbursed can cover room and board, as well as tuition fees, books, supplies and equipment required for enrollment or attendance at a "qualified institution" (defined below). The participant retains ownership of his/her deposits in the trust until disbursement, at which time ownership is transferred to the beneficiary (student). Interest earnings disbursed from the trust are not included in the beneficiary's gross income (while attending college).
Qualified Institutions
Neither the beneficiary nor the participant will have to choose a college when opening a Scholarshare account. However, the type of college the beneficiary plans to attend will affect the maximum contribution allowed, i.e., community college, state university, private institution, etc. The student may use the funds to attend any qualified institution. A qualified institution is one that offers credit toward:
A bachelor's degree; An associate's degree; A graduate level or professional degree; and Another recognized post-secondary credential. Certain proprietary and post-secondary vocational schools are also eligible institutions.
At the time the beneficiary enrolls in college, the Scholarshare Program will transfer payments from the participant's Scholarshare account directly to the college to pay the beneficiary's qualified expenses.
Transferability
If the beneficiary dies or does not attend college, the contributor has the option of canceling the account or changing the beneficiary. Cancellation results in a refund equal to the then-current market value less a penalty of no less than 10 percent of the earnings. The penalty is waived in the event of the beneficiary's death.
Without cause and before the beneficiary's admission to college, the contributor may change the beneficiary designation to relatives of the original beneficiary or relatives of the beneficiary's spouse, including the contributor if the contributor is a relative of the original beneficiary or a relative of the original beneficiary's spouse.
Income Tax Issues
There are no income tax deductions to the contributor for placing funds into a Scholarshare program. Taxation is avoided on the earnings. Amounts paid for tuition will also be eligible for both the HOPE credit and Lifetime Learning credit, subject to the rules that regularly apply to each of those credits.
Gift Tax Issues
For gift tax purposes, deposits are completed gifts of present interests to the designated beneficiary and therefore qualify for the annual gift tax and generation-skipping transfer tax exclusion of $15,000 per year per donee as indexed. They do not qualify as excludable education expenses under the gift tax rules which allow education expenses to be paid in addition to the $15,000 annual exclusion. If the deposit exceeds the annual exclusion amount, the contributor may elect to take the balance into account ratably over a five-year period on their gift tax return.
The IRS has provided guidance on two exceptions to the 10 percent additional tax under Code Sec. 72(t)(1) for emergency personal expense distributions and domestic abuse victim distributions. These exceptions were added by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, P.L. 117-328, and became effective January 1, 2024. The Treasury Department and the IRS anticipate issuing regulations under Code Sec. 72(t) and request comments to be submitted on or before October 7, 2024.
The IRS has provided guidance on two exceptions to the 10 percent additional tax under Code Sec. 72(t)(1) for emergency personal expense distributions and domestic abuse victim distributions. These exceptions were added by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, P.L. 117-328, and became effective January 1, 2024. The Treasury Department and the IRS anticipate issuing regulations under Code Sec. 72(t) and request comments to be submitted on or before October 7, 2024.
Distributions for Emergency Personal Expenses
Code Sec. 72(t)(2)(I) provides an exception to the 10 percent additional tax for a distribution from an applicable eligible retirement plan to an individual for emergency personal expenses. The term "emergency personal expense distribution" means any distribution made from an applicable eligible retirement plan to an individual for purposes of meeting unforeseeable or immediate financial needs relating to necessary personal or family emergency expenses. The IRS specifically noted that emergency expenses could be related to: medical care; accident or loss of property due to casualty; imminent foreclosure or eviction from a primary residence; the need to pay for burial or funeral expenses; auto repairs; or any other necessary emergency personal expenses.
The IRS provides that a plan administrator or IRA custodian may rely on a written certification from the employee or IRA owner that they are eligible for an emergency personal expense distribution. Furthermore, the IRS provides that an emergency personal expense distribution is not treated as a rollover distribution and thus is not subject to mandatory 20% withholding. However, the distribution is subject to withholding, the IRS said. If the emergency personal expense distribution is repaid, it is treated as if the individual received the distribution and transferred it to an eligible retirement plan within 60 days of distribution.
If an otherwise eligible retirement plan does not offer emergency personal expense distributions, the IRS indicated that an individual may still take an otherwise permissible distribution and treat it as such on their federal income tax return. The individual claims on Form 5329 that the distribution is an emergency personal expense distribution, in accordance with the form’s instructions. The individual has the option to repay the distribution to an IRA within 3 years.
Distributions to Domestic Abuse Victims
Code Sec. 72(t)(2)(K) provides an exception to the 10 percent additional tax for an eligible distribution to a domestic abuse victim (domestic abuse victim distribution). The guidance defines a"domesticabusevictimdistribution" as any distribution from an applicable eligible retirement plan to a domestic abuse victim if made during the 1-year period beginning on any date on which the individual is a victim of domestic abuse by a spouse or domestic partner. "Domesticabuse" is defined as physical, psychological, sexual, emotional, or economic abuse, including efforts to control, isolate, humiliate, or intimidate the victim, or to undermine the victim’s ability to reason independently, including by means of abuse of the victim’s child or another family member living in the household.
As with distributions for emergency personal expenses, a retirement plan may rely on an employee’s written certification that they qualify for a domestic abuse victim distribution. Similarly, if an otherwise eligible retirement plan does not offer domestic abuse victim distributions, the IRS indicated that an individual may still take an otherwise permissible distribution and treat it as such on their federal income tax return. The individual claims on Form 5329 that the distribution is a domestic abuse victim distribution, in accordance with the form’s instructions. The individual has the option to repay the distribution to an IRA within 3 years.
Request for Comments
The Treasury Department and the IRS invite comments on the guidance, and specifically on whether the Secretary should adopt regulations providing exceptions to the rule that a plan administrator may rely on an employee’s certification relating to emergency personal expense distributions and procedures to address cases of employee misrepresentation. Comments should be submitted in writing on or before October 7, 2024, and should include a reference to Notice 2024-55.
On June 17, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service announced a new regulatory initiative focused on closing tax loopholes and stopping abusive partnership transactions used by wealthy taxpayers to avoid paying taxes.
On June 17, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service announced a new regulatory initiative focused on closing tax loopholes and stopping abusive partnership transactions used by wealthy taxpayers to avoid paying taxes.
Specifically targeted by this new tax compliance effort are partnership basis shifting transactions. In these transactions, a single business that operates through many different legal entities (related parties) enters into a set of transactions that manipulate partnership tax rules to maximize tax deductions and minimize tax liability. These basis shifting transactions allow closely related parties to avoid taxes.
The use of these abusive transactions grew during a period of severe underfunding for the IRS. As such, the audit rates for these increasingly complex structures fell significantly. It is estimated that these abusive transactions, which cut across a wide variety of industries and individuals, could potentially cost taxpayers more than $50 billion over a 10-year period, according to an IRS News Release.
"Using Inflation Reduction Act funding, we are working to reverse more than a decade of declining audits among the highest income taxpayers, as well as complex partnerships and corporations," IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said during a press call discussing the new effort on June 14, 2024.
"This announcement signals the IRS is accelerating our work in the partnership arena, which has been overlooked for more than a decade and allowed tax abuse to go on for far too long," said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel. "We are building teams and adding expertise inside the agency so we can reverse long-term compliance declines that have allowed high-income taxpayers and corporations to hide behind complexity to avoid paying taxes. Billions are at stake here".
This multi-stage regulatory effort announced by the Treasury and IRS includes the following guidance designed to stop the use of basis shifting transactions that use related-party partnerships to avoid taxes:
-
proposed regulations under existing regulatory authority to stop related parties in complex partnership structures from shifting the tax basis of their assets amongst each other to take abusive deductions or reduce gains when the asset is sold;
-
proposed regulation to require taxpayers and their material advisers to report if they and their clients are participating in abusive partnership basis shifting transactions; and
-
a Revenue Rulingproviding that certain related-party partnership transactions involving basis shifting lack economic substance.
"Treasury and the IRS are focused on addressing high-end tax abuse from all angles, and the proposed rules released today will increase tax fairness and reduce the deficit," said U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen.
In the June 14, 2024, press call, Commissioner Danny Werfel also noted that there will be an increase in audits of large partnerships with average assets over $10 billion dollars and larger organizational changes taking place to support compliance efforts, including the creation of a new associate office that will focus exclusively on partnerships, S corporations, trusts, and estates.
By Catherine S. Agdeppa, Content Management Analyst
A savings account with the tax benefits of a health savings account or an educations savings account but without the singular restricted focus could be something that gains traction as Congress addresses the tax provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that expire in 2025.
A savings account with the tax benefits of a health savings account or an educations savings account but without the singular restricted focus could be something that gains traction as Congress addresses the tax provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that expire in 2025.
The concept was promoted by multiple witnesses testifying during a recent Senate Finance Committee hearing on the subject of child savings accounts and other tax advantaged accounts that would benefit children. It also is the subject of a recently released report from The Tax Foundation.
Rather than push new limited-use savings accounts, "policymakers may want to consider enacting a more comprehensive savings program such as a universalsavingsaccount," Veronique de Rugy, a research fellow at George Mason University, testified before the committee during the May 21, 2024, hearing. "Universalsavingsaccounts will allow workers to save in one simple account from which they would withdraw without penalty for any expected or unexpected events throughout their lifetime."
She noted that, like other more focused savings accounts, like health savings accounts, it would have "the benefit of sheltering some income from the punishing double taxation that our code imposes."
De Rugy added that universal savings accounts "have a benefit that they do not discourage savings for those who are concerned that the conditions for withdrawals would stop them from addressing an emergency in their family."
Adam Michel, director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute, who also promoted the idea of universal savings accounts. He said these accounts "would allow families to save for their kids or any of life’s other priorities. The flexibility of these accounts make them best suited for lower and middle income Americans."
He also noted that they are promoting savings in countries that have implemented them, including Canada and United Kingdom.
"For example, almost 60 percent of Canadians own tax-free savingsaccounts," Michel said. "And more than half of those account holders earned the equivalent of about $37,000 a year. These accounts have helped increase savings and support the rest of the Canadian savings ecosystem."
De Rugy noted that in countries that have implemented it, they function like a Roth account in that money that has already been taxed can be put into it and not penalized or taxed upon withdrawal.
Michel also noted that the if the tax benefits extend to corporations as they do with deposits to employee health savings accounts, "to the extent that you lower the corporate income tax, you’re going to encourage a different additional investment into savings by those entities."
Simulating The Universal Savings Account Impact
The Tax Foundation in its report simulated how a universal savings account could work, based on how they are implemented in Canada. The simulation assumed the accounts could go active in 2025 for adults aged 18 years or older.
On a post-tax basis, individuals would be allowed to contribute up to $9,100 on a post-tax basis annually, with that cap indexed for inflation. Any unused "contribution room" would be allowed to be carried forward. Earnings would be allowed to grow tax-free and withdrawals would be allowed for any purpose without penalty or further taxation. Any withdrawal would be added back to that year’s contribution room and that would be eligible for carryover as well.
"The fiscal cost of this USA policy would be offset by ending the tax advantage of contributions to HSAs beginning in 2025," the report states. "As such, future contributions to HSAs would be given normal tax treatment, i.e. included in taxable income and subject to payroll tax with subsequent returns on contributions also included in taxable income."
In this scenario, the Tax Foundation report estimates that "this policy change would on net raise tax revenue by about $110 billion over the 10-year budget window."
As for the impact on taxpayers, the "after-tax income would fall by about 0.1 percent in 2025 and by a smaller amount in 2034, reflecting the net tax increase in those years," the report states. "Over the long run, and accounting for economic impacts, taxpayers across every quintile would see a small increase in after-tax income on average, but the top 5 percent of earners would continue to see a small decrease in after-tax income on average."
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
The Internal Revenue Service’s use of artificial intelligence in selecting tax returns for National Research Program audits that areused to estimate the tax gap needs more documentation and transparency, the U.S. Government Accountability Office stated.
The Internal Revenue Service’s use of artificial intelligence in selecting tax returns for National Research Program audits that areused to estimate the tax gap needs more documentation and transparency, the U.S. Government Accountability Office stated.
In a report issued June 5, 2024, the federal government watchdog noted that while the agency uses AI to improve the efficiency and selection of audit cases to help identify noncompliance, "IRS has not completed its documentation of several elements of its AI sample selection models, such as key components and technical specifications."
GAO noted that the IRS began using AI in a pilot in tax year 2019 for sampling tax returns for NRP audits. The current plan is to use AI to create a sample size of 4,000 returns to measure compliance and help inform tax gap estimates, although GAO expressed concerns about the accuracy of the estimates with that sample size.
"For example, NRP historically included more than 2,500 returns that claimed the Earned Income Tax Credit, but the redesigned sample has included less than 500 of these returns annually," the report stated.
IRS told GAO that it "is exploring ways to combine operational audit data with NRP audit data when developing its taxgapestimates. IRS officials also told us that if IRS can reliably combine these data for taxgap analysis, IRS might be better positioned to identify emerging trends in noncompliance and reduce the uncertainty of the estimates due to the small sample size."
The report also highlighted the fact that the agency "has multiple documents that collectively provide technical details and justifications for the design of the AI models. However, no set of documents contains complete information and IRS analyst could use to run or update the models, and several key documents are in draft form."
"Completing documentation would help IRS retain organizational knowledge, ensure the models are implemented consistently, and make the process more transparent to future users," the report stated.
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
Probably one of the more difficult decisions you will have to make as a consumer is whether to buy or lease your auto. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of buying vs. leasing a new car or truck before you get to the car dealership can ease the decision-making process and may alleviate unpleasant surprises later.
Probably one of the more difficult decisions you will have to make as a consumer is whether to buy or lease your auto. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of buying vs. leasing a new car or truck before you get to the car dealership can ease the decision-making process and may alleviate unpleasant surprises later.
Nearly one-third of all new vehicles (and up to 75% of all new luxury cars) are leased rather than purchased. But the decision to lease or buy must ultimately be made on an individual level, taking into consideration each person's facts and circumstances.
Buying
Advantages.
- You own the car at the end of the loan term.
- Lower insurance premiums.
- No mileage limitations.
Disadvantages.
- Higher upfront costs.
- Higher monthly payments.
- Buyer bears risk of future value decrease.
Leasing
Advantages.
- Lower upfront costs.
- Lower monthly payments.
- Lessor assumes risk of future value decrease.
- Greater purchasing power.
- Potential additional income tax benefits.
- Ease of disposition.
Disadvantages.
- You do not own the car at the end of the lease term, although you may have the option to purchase at that time.
- Higher insurance premiums.
- Potential early lease termination charges.
- Possible additional costs for abnormal wear & tear (determined by lessor).
- Extra charges for mileage in excess of mileage specified in your lease contract.
Before you make the decision whether to lease or buy your next vehicle, it makes sense to ask yourself the following questions:
How long do I plan to keep the vehicle? If you want to keep the car or truck longer than the term of the lease, you may be better off purchasing the vehicle as purchase contracts usually result in a lower overall cost of ownership.
How much am I going to drive the vehicle? If you are an outside salesperson and you drive 30,000 miles per year, any benefits you may have gained upfront by leasing will surely be lost in the end to excess mileage charges. Most lease contracts include mileage of between 12,000-15,000 per year - any miles driven in excess of the limit are subject to some pretty hefty charges.
How expensive of a vehicle do I want? If you can really only afford monthly payments on a Honda Civic but you've got your eye on a Lexus, you may want to consider leasing. Leasing usually results in lower upfront fees in the form of lower down payments and deferred sales tax, in addition to lower monthly payments. This combination can make it easier for you to get into the car of your dreams.
If you have any questions about the tax ramifications regarding buying vs. leasing an automobile or would like some additional information when making your decision, please contact the office.