Independent Contractors Effective January 1, 2020

Independent Contractors effective January 1, 2020

To our business clients:

In an effort to get accurate and timely filed 1099 forms, the date that 1099s are due continues to be January 31st. The penalty for each instance of failing to file a correct 1099 form by the due date with the IRS is as follows:

• $50 per form if correctly filed within 30 days of the due date;
• $110 per form if correctly filed after 30 days of the due date but by August 1;
• $270 per form if filed after August 1 or not filed (assuming there was no intentional disregard)
• At least $550 per form with no maximum penalty if due to intentional disregard of the requirements.

A similar additional penalty framework applies if the payee isn’t provided their copy by these deadlines.

California may impose its own penalties when conducting an audit, the most severe of which is for failure to file 1099-MISC forms* to independent contractors. In those cases, California can effectively negate the deduction for those expenses by imposition of its penalties.

Federal business tax returns currently contain two questions regarding the filing of 1099 forms. We'll be checking with you about your fulfilment of the 1099 form filing requirements in order to answer those questions correctly.

WHAT IS A 1099 FORM?

A 1099 form is an informational return on which businesses report various sorts of payments they've made to partnerships, sole proprietorships, individuals and certain types of corporations during the calendar year. Some of the most common types of 1099 forms are:

WHO SHOULD WE SEND A 1099 FORM TO?

They should be sent to partnerships, sole proprietorships, limited liability companies (LLC), limited liability partnerships (LLP), and individuals you made payments to in the course of your business. A 1099 should also be sent to any attorney, physician, or a supplier of medical services even if they are a corporation. Any payment on which you take backup withholding for Federal income taxes must be reported on the appropriate Form 1099, regardless of the amount of the payment. This means:

1. Only send 1099s for payments you made related to the operation of your business.              
2. You don't need to send 1099s for materials or products you purchased.
3. You don't need to send 1099s to corporations (unless it is for medical or legal services). However, the burden to find out if it's a corporation is on you. If the name has "Incorporated", "Inc.", "Corporation", or "Corp." in it, you can assume it's a corporation. Otherwise, you need to ask.
4. You don't need to send 1099s to exempt organizations, retirement trusts, or IRA accounts.

FILING RETURNS WITH THE IRS

If you must file any Form 1098 or 1099 with the IRS and you are filing paper forms, you must send a Form 1096 with each type of form as the transmittal document.

For businesses located in California the government copies need to be mailed to:

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service Center
Ogden, UT 84201

Businesses who file 250 or more informational returns are required to file electronically through the IRS' FIRE System (Filing Information Returns Electronically). We can help you with this.

CALIFORNIA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

If you file IRS Forms 1099 series, Forms 5498, 1098 and W-2G with the IRS on paper, you are not required to file a paper copy of the same form with the Franchise Tax Board. The IRS will forward the information to them. When the Federal and State payment amounts differ, you may file information returns directly with the Franchise Tax Board.

WHAT INFORMATION DO YOU NEED FOR THE 1099 FORM?

1. Name and address of whom you paid.
2. The amount you paid them during 2019.
3. Their identification number. For an individual this would be their social security number. For a proprietorship, LLC, partnership, or corporation this would be their employer identification number which is a nine-digit number, usually beginning with "94-" or "77-".

IMPORTANT:   It is extremely important that the name recorded on the 1099 agrees with the name listed on the Social Security Administration's records for the specified identification number. Therefore, in the case where an individual is self-employed, care must be taken to make sure that the proper name is listed on the 1099. Any "dba" name should be listed on the 1099 underneath the individual's legal name which agrees with the Social Security Administration's records.
 

WHAT IF SOMEONE WON'T GIVE US THEIR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER?

If someone won't give you their identification number, you're not sure they're giving you the correct number, or you're not sure they're incorporated as they say, then you should send them a W-9 form (available at the IRS website) by certified mail, return receipt requested. The receipt will document your request for their number and help you avoid the penalty for filing a 1099 form without an identification number. If the W-9 form is completed and returned to you, it will take you off the hook for both the accuracy of the identification number used and as to whether they're really a corporation.

WHAT CAN SEEBA & ASSOCIATES DO TO HELP?

Please give us a call if you would like us to help in the preparation of these 1099 forms. We can:

1. Answer your questions regarding the issues discussed above,
2. Prepare 1099 forms for you from information you've gathered, consisting of name, address, identification number, and amount paid in 2019, or
3. Figure the amount you've paid for 2019 from your books and records. Along with the address and identification number supplied by you, we'll prepare the 1099 forms.
4. eFile your 1099 forms via the IRS system.

*         *         *         *         *

IMPORTANT

Please let us know as soon as possible if we can assist you since the 1099s are now due by January 31^st.

You should be getting an identification number or completed W-9 form from anyone you pay for services, even if less than $600, before you pay them. Otherwise, you are obligated to withhold 24% of their payment and remit it to the IRS. Please call us if you run into problems where the 24% "backup withholding" may come into effect. 

You should also keep in mind that you will need to maintain records of amounts paid to independent contractors as payments are made or contracts are signed in order to comply with the 2020 Employment Development Department reporting requirement for independent contractors. 

If you have any questions regarding 1099 filings, feel free to contact us.

To our business clients:

2020 FEDERAL PAYROLL DEPOSIT REQUIREMENTS:

Standard Mileage Rates for 2020

For 2020, the standard rate for business mileage will be 57.5 cents per mile. The previous rate was 58 cents per mile.

The standard rate for the use of a car when providing services to a charitable organization will be remain at 14 cents per mile.

The 2020 standard mileage rate for the use of your car for medical expenses or deductible moving expenses will be 17 cents per mile. The previous rate was 20 cents per mile.

BONUSES- Just a reminder - holiday bonuses are subject to all payroll taxes.

This is true whether the bonus is paid in cash, by check or by a gift card. For income tax withholding, the rates are 25% federal and 10.23% state. If you have a net figure in mind, the gross amount can be calculated as follows:

1. If the employee has not passed the wage limits for SDI ($118,371) or FICA ($132,900), divide the desired net by .5612 to arrive at the gross.
2. If the employee has exceeded the SDI limit only, divide the desired net by .5712 to arrive at the gross.
3. If the employee has exceeded both the SDI and FICA limits, divide the desired net by .6332 to arrive at the gross.

Example: You wish to pay Employee A a net bonus of $100.00 -

Employee A has earned $4,000.00 for 2019. He is subject to all taxes. Dividing $100.00 by .5612 (See #1 above) yields a gross of $178.19. Deductions would be: Federal income tax $44.55 (25%); Social Security $11.05 (6.2%); Medicare $2.58 (1.45%); State income tax $18.23 (10.23%); SDI $1.78 (1%).

The percentages and example shown above pertain to checks dated prior to January 1, 2020. For checks dated after December 31, 2019, you must use the 2020 withholding rates and limits.

AWARDS - As part of a meaningful presentation, employers can give employees awards for length of service or safety achievements of up to $400 per year. In order to be deductible to the employer and non-taxable to the employee, the awards must be made with noncash items. Awards of cash or items readily convertible into cash, such as gift certificates, are subject to payroll taxes, no matter the amount.  Length of Service Awards are deductible to the employer if employees have more than five years of service and have not received such an award in the last four years. Safety Achievement Awards aren't deductible if given to a manager, administrator, clerical employee, or professional, nor if given to more than 10% of the other employees. We recommend that any prizes awarded be documented by corporations in their corporate minutes, although the law doesn't require this.

GIFTS - Business gifts are still limited to $25 to any individual per year. They can be made on a discriminatory basis and can be in cash. These gifts are deductible to the business and non-taxable to the recipient.

Items clearly of an advertising nature that cost $4 or less, such as promotional items, aren’t considered gifts and therefore, aren’t included in calculating the $25 limit for an individual.

In addition, gifts that are considered “de minimis” fringe benefits aren’t restricted by the $25 per recipient limit, and are considered to be made tax-free to the employee. For a gift to be considered as a de minimis fringe benefit the value must be nominal, the accounting for such a gift would be administrative nitpicking, it’s only an occasional gift, and it’s given for the purpose of promoting the health, goodwill, contentment or efficiency of the employees. Some examples of such gifts are holiday turkeys, a Christmas luncheon or party.

There is no limit on gifts made to corporations or partnerships.

What did CA do?

Effective January 1, 2012, California has a new law, Senate Bill 459 (SB 459), which significantly increases the penalties that can be assessed against employers who willfully misclassify as independent contractors individuals who should be treated as employees. If your business utilizes independent contractors, it is extremely important that you take the time now to understand the impact of this new law to your company and to take the necessary steps to ensure appropriate compliance with this law. The highlights of the law are summarized below for your reference, although they are not meant to be all-inclusive.

SB 459 makes it unlawful for any person or employer to engage in “willful misclassification” of an individual as an independent contractor. The law also prohibits charging individuals who have been misclassified as independent contractors a fee or making deductions (e.g., for space rental, goods, equipment maintenance) from compensation if those acts would have violated the law had the individuals not been misclassified.

This new law comes on the tail of the IRS’s recent announcement regarding its new settlement initiative, the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (VCSP), allowing employers to: 1) come forward if they are not under audit, 2) reclassify independent contractors as employees, and 3) pay a significantly reduced employment tax.

Who has authority to assess compliance and penalties?

SB 459 authorizes the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, specifically the Labor Commissioner or a court, to assess specified civil penalties on persons or employers violating the law. SB 459 also requires the agency to take other specified disciplinary actions against these individuals.

What happens if I am found to have violated the law?

The law requires employers who are found to have engaged in a misclassification “to display prominently” for one year on their websites a notice to employees and the general public announcing, among other things, that the employer “has committed a serious violation of law by engaging in willful misclassification of employees.” The notice must be signed by a corporate officer.

What are the fines and penalties?

Violation of the new statute carries exposure for a civil penalty of between $5,000 and $15,000 for each violation. If the employer is found to have engaged “in a pattern or practice of violations,” the civil penalty is increased to $10,000 and $25,000 per violation. The law does not define the term “pattern or practice.”

Is there a “Safe Harbor” position?

Yes, treating the worker as an employee will cause you to avoid any of these potential penalties for misclassification.

Where should I go for assistance and additional information if I have independent contractors?

The IRS has a very helpful website addressing this issue http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=99921,00.html Since the Employee/Independent Contractor issue is decided based upon the preponderance of evidence, look carefully at all the factors being considered by the IRS.

Because the stakes are so high on this issue, we strongly encourage you to consult with legal counsel experienced in employment practice matters to review your independent contractor relationships, to determine the appropriateness of these classifications, and to assist you if re-classifications may be required to mitigate potential legal exposures to your business. We can point you to the pertinent IRS Guidelines, but we will not be responsible for advising you with respect to independent contractor status as part of our services.

Please call us if you have questions or would like a referral to a labor law attorney to discuss this matter further.

So that the reporting for this fringe benefit is not so burdensome, the IRS allows employers to include the personal use of business-owned cars during November and December in the following year's W-2s.

The following information should serve to remind you of how to calculate the value of the personal use of business-owned cars for W-2 purposes and how to withhold taxes on it:

1. For non-office/shareholders: If commuting is the only personal use of a business-owned car allowed by an employer, then the employer would need to include $3 a day in the employee's wages to recognize the value of the commute, plus 5.5 cents/mile for the fuel provided by the employer.

2. For officers and shareholders: The personal use of a business-owned vehicle must be included in their W-2. The formula for computing the value of their personal use is as follows
    

   1. Annual lease value based on the IRS table (see attached table) prorated for the number of months the vehicle was used from November-October.
   2. Times this value by the personal use percentage determined from mileage records maintained throughout the year which list business and personal miles driven.
   3. Then add the lesser of the actual cost, or 5.5 cents/mile, for gasoline provided by employer that was used for personal travel.
   4. Next subtract any reimbursement that the employer receives from employee.
   5. The result is the value of the personal use of the business-owned vehicle to be included in employee's W-2 compensation.

                                                                                   or                                      
                                                                 (A x B) + (C - D) = E

3. It is possible to avoid income tax withholding on the value of the personal use of an employer-provided vehicle. However, early action was required in order to avoid withholding income tax for this calendar year. The employer must have notified the employee in writing by January 31st or within 30 days after receiving the vehicle during the year, in order to avoid income tax withholding on this fringe benefit. If the employee is not notified of the withholding election by the specified dates, the employer must withhold income taxes on the value included in the W-2. For the next calendar year, the employee must be notified in writing by January 31st or within 30 days of receiving the vehicle, in order to avoid withholding on this fringe benefit.

4. Even though an employer can avoid withholding income tax on the value of the personal use of a vehicle (as described in item 3 above), the Social Security tax (FICA), the Medicare tax, and State Disability Insurance (SDI) must be withheld on the value included in the W-2. However, there are some choices available on the timing of these withholdings. The employer is given the option of calculating and withholding these taxes on a pay period, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual basis. As stated previously, the annual period would run from November through October, which means that the employer could wait until the end of October to figure the taxes to be withheld. If the employee will reach the maximum Social Security wages for the year by that time, without considering the fringe benefit, only Medicare tax withholding would be necessary.

Please feel free to contact us if you need help in calculating the value of the personal usage of business-owned cars, but remember it must be done soon and included on this calendar year's W-2 forms.                                            

Click here to view the Business Car Usage

With certain key exceptions, employers must pay nonunion, non-exempt employees (who are not working an alternative workweek schedule) at least time and one-half pay for: *Hours worked in excess of eight hours in one day, *Hours worked in excess of 40 hours in one workweek, and *The first eight hours worked on the seventh day of work in a given workweek.

In addition, employers must pay employees at least double time for any hours worked in excess of 12 hours in one day and hours worked in excess of eight hours on any seventh day of a workweek.

Under the new law compensatory time off in lieu of payment for hours worked by non-exempt employees in excess of the normal workday and workweek (as described above) is no longer permissible

Exceptions

Employees, who on July 1, 1999, were voluntarily working an alternate workweek schedule (adopted without an employee election), may continue to work that schedule, of not more than 10 hours work a day, and continue to be exempt from the overtime rules if the employer approves a written request by the employee to continue to work that schedule. In addition, employees may elect, by two-thirds vote, to work an alternative workweek of up to 10-hour work days within a 40-hour workweek without being subject to the overtime rules.

Personal Time Off

Employees may make up lost time due to a personal obligation by giving a signed, written request to an employer to make up the work. Please note however that, if an employer approves an employee's written request to make up work time that is lost as a result of a personal obligation, the hours of that makeup work time, if performed in the same workweek in which the time was lost, should not be counted toward computing the total number of hours worked in a day for purposes of the overtime pay requirements. The only exception would be in the case of an employee who works more than 11 hours in one day or 40 hours in one workweek.

All businesses are required to report independent contractors, to whom they will be issuing a 1099-MISC form, to the California Employment Development Department. The information provided will be forwarded to state and local child support agencies to help in their efforts to locate parents who are delinquent in their child support obligations.

The information must be reported to the EDD, using form DE 542 ("Report of Independent Contractors"), within twenty days of either entering a contract for $600 or more, or the date during the calendar year when total payments to the independent contractor reach $600. Form DE 542 requests the independent contractors' full name, social security number, address and the contract dates and amounts. You may obtain forms by calling the Employment Development Department at (916) 657-0529, accessing the EDD web site at www.edd.ca.gov, or contacting our office.

Only individuals working as independent contractors are to be reported. Thus, you don't need to report corporations or partnerships which you pay for services provided to your business. However, you must report all independent contractors you hire for $600 or more, regardless of whether the independent contractor lives or works in California or another state. You only need to report an independent contractor one time per each calendar year that you contract or pay the contractor $600 or more.

The completed DE 542 forms can be either mailed or faxed to the Employment Development Department. The mailing address is:Employment Development Department PO Box 997350 MIC 96 Sacramento, CA 95899-7350 And the fax number is: (916) 319-4410

The EDD may assess a $24 penalty for each failure to comply with the reporting requirements within the required time frame. Also, a penalty of $490 may be assessed for the failure to report the required information due to an agreement between you and the independent contractor to disregard the filing requirements.

California's state-run college saving program, Golden State Scholarshare Trust allows parents and others to put aside tax-deferred money for college.

Plan Features

Money that participants (parents, grandparents, businesses, etc.) contribute to the Scholarshare Trust will grow while in the participant's account and be tax free for federal and California purposes upon disbursement to the beneficiary's school of choice. The funds disbursed can cover room and board, as well as tuition fees, books, supplies and equipment required for enrollment or attendance at a "qualified institution" (defined below). The participant retains ownership of his/her deposits in the trust until disbursement, at which time ownership is transferred to the beneficiary (student). Interest earnings disbursed from the trust are not included in the beneficiary's gross income (while attending college).

Qualified Institutions

Neither the beneficiary nor the participant will have to choose a college when opening a Scholarshare account. However, the type of college the beneficiary plans to attend will affect the maximum contribution allowed, i.e., community college, state university, private institution, etc. The student may use the funds to attend any qualified institution. A qualified institution is one that offers credit toward:

A bachelor's degree; An associate's degree; A graduate level or professional degree; and Another recognized post-secondary credential. Certain proprietary and post-secondary vocational schools are also eligible institutions.

At the time the beneficiary enrolls in college, the Scholarshare Program will transfer payments from the participant's Scholarshare account directly to the college to pay the beneficiary's qualified expenses.

Transferability

If the beneficiary dies or does not attend college, the contributor has the option of canceling the account or changing the beneficiary. Cancellation results in a refund equal to the then-current market value less a penalty of no less than 10 percent of the earnings. The penalty is waived in the event of the beneficiary's death.

Without cause and before the beneficiary's admission to college, the contributor may change the beneficiary designation to relatives of the original beneficiary or relatives of the beneficiary's spouse, including the contributor if the contributor is a relative of the original beneficiary or a relative of the original beneficiary's spouse.

Income Tax Issues

There are no income tax deductions to the contributor for placing funds into a Scholarshare program. Taxation is avoided on the earnings. Amounts paid for tuition will also be eligible for both the HOPE credit and Lifetime Learning credit, subject to the rules that regularly apply to each of those credits.

Gift Tax Issues

For gift tax purposes, deposits are completed gifts of present interests to the designated beneficiary and therefore qualify for the annual gift tax and generation-skipping transfer tax exclusion of $15,000 per year per donee as indexed. They do not qualify as excludable education expenses under the gift tax rules which allow education expenses to be paid in addition to the $15,000 annual exclusion. If the deposit exceeds the annual exclusion amount, the contributor may elect to take the balance into account ratably over a five-year period on their gift tax return.

The IRS has released new proposed rules related to charitable contributions made to get around the $10,000/$5,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. The proposed regulations:

The IRS has released new proposed rules related to charitable contributions made to get around the $10,000/$5,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. The proposed regulations:

• incorporate the safe harbor in Notice 2019-12 for individuals who have any portion of a charitable deduction disallowed to the receipt of SALT benefits;
• incorporate the safe harbor in Rev. Proc. 2019-12 for business entities to deduct certain payments made to a charitable organization in exchange for SALT benefits; and
• clarify the application of the quid pro quo principle under Code Sec. 170 to benefits received or expected to be received by the donor from a third party.

SALT Limit

An individual’s itemized deduction of SALT taxes is limited to $10,000 ($5,000 if married filing separately) for tax years beginning after 2017. Some states and local governments have adopted laws that allowed individuals to receive a state tax credit for contributions to certain charitable funds. These laws are aimed at getting around the SALT deduction limit by creating a charitable deduction for federal income tax purposes.

The IRS issued final regulations in June 2019 that provide that the receipt of a SALT credit for a charitable contribution is the receipt of a return benefit (quid pro quo benefit). Thus, the taxpayer must reduce any contribution deduction by the amount of any SALT credit received or expected to receive in return. The regulations contain a de minimis exception if the SALT credit does not exceed 15 percent of the taxpayer’s charitable payment.

A taxpayer is not required to reduce the charitable contribution deduction because of the receipt of SALT deductions. However, the taxpayer must reduce the charitable deduction if it receives or expects to receive SALT deductions in excess of the taxpayer’s payment or the fair market value of property transferred.

Payments by Individuals

A safe harbor was provided in Notice 2019-12 for individuals who have a portion of a charitable deduction disallowed due to the receipt of a SALT credit. Under the safe harbor, any disallowed portion of the charitable contribution deduction may be treated as the payment of SALT taxes for the purposes of deducting taxes under Code Sec. 164.

The new proposed regulations incorporate the safe harbor in Notice 2019-12. The safe harbor is allowed in the tax year the charitable payment is made, but only to the extent that the SALT credit is applied as provided under state or local law to offset the individual’s SALT liability for the current or preceding tax year. Any unused credit may be carried forward as provided under state and local law.

Payments by Business Entities

The IRS also provided a safe harbor in Rev. Proc. 2019-12 that business entities may continue to deduct charitable contributions in exchange a SALT credit. A business entity may deduct the payments as ordinary and necessary business expenses under Code Sec. 162 if made for a business purpose.

The new proposed regulations incorporate the safe harbor in Rev. Proc. 2019-12. If a C corporation or specified pass-through entity makes the charitable payment in exchange for a SALT credit, it may deduct the payment as a business expense to the extent of any SALT credit received or expected to be received. In addition, the new proposal provides that if the charitable payment bears a direct relationship to the taxpayer’s business then it may be deducted as a business expense rather than a charitable contribution regardless of whether the taxpayer receives or expects to receive a SALT credit.

Benefits Received from Third Party

If a taxpayer receives any goods, services, or other benefits from a charitable organization in consideration for a contribution, then the charitable deduction must be reduced by the value of those benefits. If the contribution exceeds the fair market value of the benefits received, then only the excess is a deductible as a charitable contribution.

The new proposed regulations clarify that this quid pro quo principal applies regardless of whether the party providing the goods, services, or other benefits is the charitable organization or not. A taxpayer will be treated under the proposal as receiving goods and services in consideration for the taxpayer’s charitable contribution if, at the time the taxpayer makes the payment or transfer, the taxpayer receives or expects to receive goods or services in return.

Final regulations provide rules on the attribution of ownership of stock or other interests, for determining whether a person is a related person with respect to a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) under the foreign base company sales income rules. The regulations also provide rules to determine whether a CFC receives rents in the active conduct of a trade or business, for determining the exception from foreign personal holding company income.

Final regulations provide rules on the attribution of ownership of stock or other interests, for determining whether a person is a related person with respect to a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) under the foreign base company sales income rules. The regulations also provide rules to determine whether a CFC receives rents in the active conduct of a trade or business, for determining the exception from foreign personal holding company income.

The regulations adopt without change, proposed regulations published on May 20, 2019 ( NPRM REG-125135-15).

Attribution of Ownership

The regulations provide specific rules for applying principles similar to those in the Code Sec. 958(b) constructive ownership rules when determining related person status under the foreign base company sales income rules. The determination of related person status is relevant for many purposes, including whether certain types of income can be characterized as subpart F foreign base company sales or service income.

A person is a related person with respect to a CFC if the person is:

• an individual who controls the CFC,
• an entity that controls or is controlled by the CFC, or
• an entity that is controlled by the same person that controls the CFC.

Rules similar to those for determining stock ownership in Code Sec. 958 apply for purposes of determining whether a person is a related person. The regulations limit the application of the downward attribution rules in Code Sec. 318(a)(3), which apply by reference to the Code Sec. 958 stock ownership rules, and which attribute ownership downward from the owner of an entity to an entity. The downward attribution rules are applied regardless of the size of the ownership interest in a partnership, estate, or trust, but are applied to corporations based on a 50-percent or more ownership interest.

The regulations address concern that application of the downward attribution rules could inappropriately treat entities (including CFCs) that do not have significant relationships with each other as related persons. Accordingly, the regulations provide that the downward attribution rules of Code Sec. 318(a)(3) and Reg. §1.958-2(d) will not apply for purposes of determining related person status under the foreign base company sales income rules.

The change does not preclude a corporation, partnership, trust, or estate from being treated as controlled by the same person or persons that control the CFC under other rules that remain applicable for the related person rules.

Additionally, an anti-abuse rule is provided with respect to the option attribution rule in Code Sec. 318(a)(4). The option attribution rule in Code Sec. 318(a)(4) and Reg. §1.958-2(e) will not be applied to treat a person with an option as owning the stock or an equity interest for purposes of the related person rule if the principal purpose of using the option was to cause a person to be treated as a related person.

The regulations also incorporate a similar rule issued in section 7(d) of Notice 2007-9, 2007-1 CB 401. The rule applies if the principal purpose for the use of an option is to qualify dividends, interest, rents or royalties paid by a foreign corporation for the Code Sec. 954(c)(6) CFC look-through exception from foreign personal holding company income. The rule applies to tax years of CFCs beginning after December 31, 2006, and ending before November 19, 2019, and to tax years of U.S. shareholders in which or with which such tax years end.

Personal Holding Company Income

The regulations modify the foreign personal holding company rules for amounts paid or incurred by a CFC in connection with the CFC’s rental income and the active rents exception. Rents are excluded from foreign personal holding company income if the rents are:

• received from a person other than a related person, and
• from the active conduct of a trade or business.

If rents are from leasing property as a result of marketing activities, there must be a substantial marketing organization in order to meet the active trade or business test. Under a safe harbor, an organization is substantial if active leasing expenses equal or exceed 25 percent of adjusted leasing profit. If the CFC receives rents from property it does not own, the substantiality of the organization is determined net of those rent payments.

The regulations extend the rule to apply to royalties in addition to rents. As a result, the substantiality of the organization is determined under the safe harbor net of the rents or royalties paid or incurred by the lessor CFC, for the right to use the property (or a component part of the property) that generated the rental income.

Applicability Date

The regulations generally apply to tax years of CFCs ending on or after November 19, 2019, and to tax years of U.S. shareholders in which or with which such tax years end. The regulations on the downward attribution rule, and the option anti-abuse rule for use of the option to treat a person as a related person with respect to a CFC, apply to tax years of CFCs ending on or after May 17, 2019, and to tax years of U.S. shareholders in which or with which such tax years end, with respect to amounts received or accrued by a CFC on or after May 17, 2019, to the extent the amounts are received or accrued in advance of the period to which such amounts are attributable with a principal purpose of avoiding application of the rules.

The IRS has issued final and proposed regulations implementing the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) under Code Sec. 59A. The BEAT is a minimum tax that certain large corporations must pay on certain payments made to foreign related parties, and was added by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ( P.L. 115-97).

The IRS has issued final and proposed regulations implementing the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) under Code Sec. 59A. The BEAT is a minimum tax that certain large corporations must pay on certain payments made to foreign related parties, and was added by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ( P.L. 115-97).

The final regulations adopt proposed rules ( REG-104259-18) published on December 21, 2018 (2018 proposed regulations), with certain modifications. The proposed regulations ( REG-112607-19) (2019 proposed regulations) provide rules under Code Secs. 59A and 6031 regarding certain aspects of the BEAT.

Final Regulations

The 2018 proposed regulations provided guidance related to the mechanics of determining a taxpayer’s BEAT liability, and addressed application of the BEAT to partnerships, banks, registered security dealers, and consolidated groups. The final BEAT regulations retain the basic approach and structure of the 2018 proposed regulations, with certain revisions.

The final regulations continue to be exclude from the denominator of the base erosion percentage Code Sec. 988 losses with respect to transactions with foreign related parties that are excluded from the numerator of the percentage. The final regulations also retain the add-back method for computing modified taxable income and the computation of base erosion minimum tax amount (BEMTA) on a taxpayer-by-taxpayer basis.

Among some of the more significant changes to the proposed rules, the final regulations:

• adopt the "with-or-within" method to determine the gross receipts and the base erosion percentage of an aggregate group;
• disregard transactions between parties if both parties were members of the aggregate group at the time of the transaction;
• exclude the base erosion tax benefits and deductions attributable to the tax year of a member of an aggregate group that begins before January 1, 2018;
• clarify that payments resulting in a reduction to determine gross income are not treated as base erosion payments;
• require that the determination of whether a payment or accrual is a base erosion payment be made under general U.S. federal income tax law;
• clarify the definition of a "base erosion payment," and generally exclude amounts transferred to, or exchanged with, a foreign related party in certain corporate nonrecognition transactions from that definition;
• clarify the rules for determining the portion of U.S. branch interest paid to foreign related parties;
• provide rules for the treatment of an interest expense determined under a U.S. tax treaty;
  include additional detail on the documentation required to satisfy the service cost method (SCM) exception;
• modify the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) exception;
• provide that the additional one percent add-on to the BEAT rate will not apply to a taxpayer that is part of an affiliated group with de minimis banking and securities dealer activities;
• provide that Code Sec. 15 applies only to the change in tax rate set forth in Code Sec. 59A(b)(2) and should not apply to the change in tax rate included in Code Sec. 59A(b)(1)(A) for tax years beginning in calendar year 2018;
• change the Qualified Derivative Payments (QDP) exception;
• clarify the rules regarding how partnerships and their partners are treated for purposes of the BEAT; and
• clarify the anti-abuse rule and certain rules applicable to insurance companies and consolidated groups.

Applicability Dates

The final regulations (other than the reporting requirements for QDPs) apply to tax years ending on or after December 17, 2018. However, taxpayers may apply these final regulations in their entirety for tax years ending before December 17, 2018. Taxpayers may also apply provisions matching Reg. §§1.59A-1 through 1.59A-9 in their entirety for all tax years ending on or before December 6, 2019. Taxpayers choosing to apply the proposed regulations must apply them consistently and cannot selectively choose which particular provisions to apply.

The related Code Sec. 6038A regulations apply to tax years beginning Monday, June 7, 2021. The related consolidated return regulations generally apply to tax years for which the original consolidated return is due (without extensions) after December 6, 2019.

2019 Proposed Regulations

The 2019 proposed regulations provide rules regarding relating to (1) how a taxpayer determines its aggregate group for purposes of determining gross receipts and the base erosion percentage; (2) an election to waive deductions; and (3) application of the BEAT to partnerships.

The 2019 proposed regulations generally apply to tax years beginning on or after the date that the final regulations are filed with the Federal Register. Certain rules, however, have specific applicability dates. In addition, taxpayers may rely on the rules in the proposed regulations in their entirety for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before the final regulations are applicable.

Practitioner’s Observations

Arlene Fitzpatrick, a Principal in the National Tax Department of Ernst & Young LLP, told Wolters Kluwer that "there are changes and new proposed rules in the package of final and proposed regulations that are helpful, though not all changes requested through the comment process were made. For example, the rules in the final regulations to exclude, in certain circumstances, from the definition of a base erosion payment amounts transferred to, or exchanged with, a foreign related party pursuant to a specified nonrecognition transaction are welcome. Furthermore, clarifying that a built-in loss recognized on a sale or transfer of property to a foreign related party is not in itself a deduction that causes the payment to be treated as a base erosion payment is helpful. The final regulations however, retain the internal dealings rule whereby a notional payment for purposes of attribution of profits under certain tax treaties may be taken into account for purposes of determining BEAT. Thus, although deductions from internal dealings would not be allowed under the Code or regulations, and only relevant under certain treaties (the regulations do not specify the treaties), the regulations provide such amounts are relevant for purposes of determining BEAT."

The IRS has issued highly anticipated final regulations on the significant changes made to the foreign tax credit rules by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97). The final regulations retain the basic approach and structure of the 2018 proposed regulations ( NPRM REG-105600-18). The final regulations also eliminate deadwood, reflect statutory amendments made prior to TCJA, and update expense allocation rules not updated since 1988.

The IRS has issued highly anticipated final regulations on the significant changes made to the foreign tax credit rules by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97). The final regulations retain the basic approach and structure of the 2018 proposed regulations ( NPRM REG-105600-18). The final regulations also eliminate deadwood, reflect statutory amendments made prior to TCJA, and update expense allocation rules not updated since 1988.

Also adopted are proposed regulations on overall foreign losses, published on June 25, 2012 ( NPRM REG-134935-11), and a U.S. taxpayer’s obligation to notify the IRS of a foreign tax redetermination, published on November 7, 2007 ( NPRM REG-209020-86).

A separate set of 2019 proposed regulations were also issued ( NPRM REG-105495-19).

Final Regulations

The final regulations make extensive changes to the rules on the determination of the foreign tax credit. Many of these changes were required to implement the TCJA, including the items discussed, below.

The final regulations provide details on how income is assigned and expenses are apportioned to the Code Sec. 951A global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) and foreign branch foreign tax credit separate limitation categories added by TCJA.

The regulations provide that, for purposes of applying the expense allocation and apportionment rules, the portion of gross income related to foreign derived intangible income (FDII) or a GILTI inclusion that is offset by a Code Sec. 250 deduction is treated as exempt income. This means that fewer expenses will be allocated to the GILTI category, resulting in a higher foreign source taxable income, a higher foreign tax credit limitation, and a larger foreign tax credit offset with respect to GILTI income.

The regulations also address how the balance of foreign tax credit carryovers prior to the TCJA are allocated across new and existing separate categories. Under a default rule, foreign tax credit carryovers remain in the general category going forward. A taxpayer can elect to reconstruct the carryover regarding a foreign branch. The final regulations provide a simplified rule under which taxpayers can assign foreign tax credits to the foreign branch category proportionately, according to the ratio of foreign taxes paid or accrued by the taxpayer’s branches to total foreign taxes paid or accrued by the taxpayer in that year.

The regulations modify the proposed rule for determining foreign branch income based on the U.S. tax-adjusted books and records of the foreign branch. The proposed regulations disregarded transfers of intellectual property (IP) between a foreign branch and its owner if the transfer would result in a deemed payment that reallocates income between the foreign branch category and the general branch category. The final regulations limit the rule to transactions that occurred after the date of the proposed regulations and include an exception for transitory ownership.

The regulations provide rules for the treatment of GILTI for purposes of the interest allocation rules. In general, a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) must allocate and apportion its interest expense among groups of income for purposes of determining tested income, subpart F income and other types of net foreign source income. A U.S. taxpayer must characterize the value of its CFC for allocating and apportioning its own interest expense. A CFC allocates and apportions its interest expense using either the modified gross income (MGI) method or the asset method. The U.S. taxpayer uses the same method to characterize the stock of its CFC. The regulations take into account gross tested income from a lower-tier CFC with respect to an upper-tier CFC for allocating the upper-tier CFC’s interest expense when applying the MGI method.

Dividends, interest, rents and royalties (look-through payments) paid to a U.S. shareholder by a CFC were generally allocated to general category income to the extent that they were not treated as passive category income. Because this type of payment made directly by a U.S. shareholder is not included in the GILTI category, the regulations provide that the look-through payments are assigned either to the general category or the foreign branch category. The payments cannot be assigned to the GILTI category.

The final regulations also address certain potentially abusive borrowing arrangements involving loans by U.S. persons to foreign partnerships that artificially increase foreign source income and the foreign tax credit limitation without affecting U.S. taxable income. Under the regulations, the interest income attributable to borrowing through a partnership is allocated across the foreign tax credit separate limitation categories in the same manner as the associated interest expense.

Applicability of Final Regs

The final regulations related to statutory amendments made by the TCJA apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Regulations that contain both rules that relate to the TCJA and rules that do not relate to the TCJA generally apply to tax years that both (1) begin after December 31, 2017, and (2) end on or after December 4, 2018.

The regulations on the deemed paid credit under Code Sec. 960 apply to tax years that both begin after December 31, 2017, and end on or after December 4, 2018. The final OFL regulations apply to tax years on or after the date the regulations are filed in the Federal Register. The final foreign tax redetermination regulations apply to foreign tax redeterminations occurring in tax years ending on or after the date the regulations are filed in the Federal Register.

Proposed Regulations

Proposed foreign tax credit regulations address changes made by the TCJA, and also respond to issues raised in the 2018 proposed regulations on the foreign tax credit ( NPRM REG-105600-18). The proposed regulations address:

• the allocation and apportionment of deductions under Code Sec. 861 through Code Sec. 865;
• the definition of "financial services income" under Code Sec. 904(d)(2)(D);
• the allocation and apportionment of creditable foreign taxes;
• the interaction of branch loss and dual consolidated loss recapture rules under Code Sec. 904(f) and Code Sec. 904(g);
• the effect of Code Sec. 905(c) foreign tax redeterminations of foreign corporations on the high-tax exception in Code Sec. 954(b)(4) and the required notification and penalty provisions;
• the definition of "personal holding company income" under Code Sec. 954; and
• the application of the foreign tax credit limitation rule to consolidated groups.

Allocation and Apportionment

Under the general rule, a taxpayer may allocate research and experimentation (R&E) expenses to the foreign tax credit separate limitation categories under the sales method or the gross income method. The proposed regulations revise the sales method to provide that R&E expenses are only allocated to income that represents return on intellectual property. When applying these rules, gross intangible income does not include dividends or amounts included under subpart F, GILTI or Code Sec. 1293. As a result, none of a U.S. taxpayer’s R&E expenses are allocated to the GILTI category. The proposed regulations eliminate the gross income method for purposes of allocating R&E expenses.

Stewardship expenses are related and allocable to dividends received or to be received from related corporations. The proposed regulations provide that stewardship expenses are allocated to subpart F and GILTI inclusions, to Code Sec. 78 dividends and all amounts included under the passive foreign investment company (PFIC) provisions.

Under the Code Sec. 818(f) allocation rules that apply to life insurance companies, expenses are generally apportioned ratably across all gross income. Under a new rule, the proposed regulations allocate expenses in a life-nonlife consolidated group solely among items of the insurance company that has reserves (separate entity method).

The final foreign tax credit limitations provide a matching rule for a U.S. partner that makes loans to a foreign partnership. Under the rule, the partner’s gross interest income is apportioned between U.S. and foreign sources in each separate foreign tax credit limitation category based on the partner’s interest expense apportionment ratios. The proposed regulations provide the same rule for loans from partnerships to U.S. partners (upstream partnership loans).

Redeterminations

Portions of the 2007 temporary regulations on foreign tax redeterminations ( T.D. 9362) are reproposed so that taxpayers can provide comments on the rules in light of the changes made by the TCJA. The proposed regulations address foreign tax redeterminations that affect the deemed paid credit under Code Sec. 960; procedural notification rules; and penalties for failure to notify the IRS of a foreign tax redetermination.

The proposed regulations require taxpayers to account for foreign tax redeterminations of foreign subsidiaries on an amended return that reflects the revised foreign taxes deemed paid under Code Sec. 960 and any changes to the taxpayer’s U.S. tax liability. This reflects the repeal of the pooling mechanism to account for redeterminations of foreign taxes.

A transition rule provides that post-2017 redeterminations of pre-2018 foreign income taxes must be made by adjusting the foreign corporation’s taxable income and earnings and profits and post-1986 undistributed earnings and income taxes in the pre-2018 year to which the redetermined foreign taxes relate. The proposed regulations also provide that the foreign tax redetermination rules cover situations in which the foreign tax redetermination affects whether or not the CFC qualifies for the high-tax exceptions under GILTI and subpart F.

Additional Rules

Additional provisions in the proposed regulations:

• modify the definition of a "financial services entity" by adopting a definition of "predominately engaged in the active conduct of a banking, insurance, finance, or similar business" and "income derived in the active conduct of a banking, insurance, finance, or similar business" that is generally consistent with Code Secs. 954(h), 1297(b)(2)(B), and 953(e);
• provide more detailed guidance on the allocation and apportionment of foreign income taxes, and generalize the rules to apply to statutory and residual groupings;
• provide a new ordering rule for overall foreign loss recapture that addresses additional income recognition under the branch loss recapture and dual consolidated loss recapture rules: the amounts are not taken into account for purposes of the ordering rules until Code Sec. 904(f)(3) amounts are determined;
• clarify the rules that apply to jurisdictions that do not impose corporate income tax on CFCs until earnings are distributed. or where foreign tax is contingent on a future distributions, for purposes of the high-tax exception in Code Sec. 954(b)(4);
• apply the principles for allocating and apportioning foreign income taxes for purposes of Code Sec. 965(g); and
• update the Code Sec. 1502 regulations relating to the computation of the consolidated foreign tax credit to reflect changes in the law, and add new rules for the determining the source and separate category of the a consolidated NOL, as well as the portion of a consolidated net operating loss (CNOL) that is apportioned to a separate return year of a member.

Applicability of Proposed Regs

The proposed regulations are generally proposed to apply to tax years that end on or after the date the proposed regulations are filed in the Federal Register, with exceptions. For example, the rules for R&E expenses are proposed to apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2019. However taxpayers on the sales method for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2020, may rely on the proposed regulations if the rules are applied consistently. Thus, a taxpayer on the sales method for its tax year beginning in 2018 may rely on the proposed regulation, but must also apply the sales method (relying on the proposed regulation) for its tax year beginning in 2019.

Practitioner’s Observations

WK: Were you surprised by anything in the final regs?

Martin Milner: The final regulations are generally consistent with the proposed regulations and do not include any major surprises. The changes and clarifications that are in the final regulations are largely helpful. As would be expected, most of the new provisions are in the proposed portion of the package.

WK: With the proposed regs are there areas that you can see may result in pushback? If so why?

Martin Milner: The business community is likely to comment on the proposal to apportion stewardship expenses to dividends, subpart F income and GILTI (including IRC Section 78 gross-ups) because many had hoped that stewardship expenses would not be apportioned to GILTI.

WK: How did you feel about the R&E Expense Apportionment changes?

Martin Milner: The mandatory sales-based apportionment of R&E expenses to all gross intangible income related to the relevant product SIC code will be complicated in practice. However, it is helpful that the proposed rules specifically exclude dividends, subpart F income and GILTI.

The IRS has released guidance that provides that the requirement to report partners’ shares of partnership capital on the tax basis method will not be effective for 2019 partnership tax years, but will first apply to 2020 partnership tax years.

The IRS has released guidance that provides that the requirement to report partners’ shares of partnership capital on the tax basis method will not be effective for 2019 partnership tax years, but will first apply to 2020 partnership tax years.

2019 Reporting

For 2019, partnerships and other persons must report partner capital accounts consistent with the reporting requirements in the 2018 forms and instructions, including the requirement to report negative tax basis capital accounts on a partner-by-partner basis.

Section 704(c) Gain or Loss

As a clarification, the notice also defines the term "partner’s share of net unrecognized Code Sec. 704(c) gain or loss," which must be reported by partnerships and other persons in 2019. Further, the notice exempts publicly traded partnerships from the requirement to report their partners’ shares of net unrecognized Code Sec. 704(c) gain or loss until further notice. Solely for purposes of completing the 2019 Forms 1065, Schedule K-1, Item N, and 8865, Schedule K-1, Item G, the notice defines a partner’s share of "net unrecognized Code Sec. 704(c) gain or loss" as the partner’s share of the net (meaning aggregate or sum) of all unrecognized gains or losses under Code Sec. 704(c) in partnership property, including Code Sec. 704(c) gains and losses arising from revaluations of partnership property.

Section 465 At-Risk Activities

The notice provides that the requirement added by the draft instructions for 2019 for partnerships to report to partners information about separate Code Sec. 465 at-risk activities will not be effective until 2020. The draft of the instructions for the 2019 Form 1065, Schedule K-1, released October 29, 2019, included a new paragraph at page 12, At-Risk Limitations, At-Risk Activity Reporting Requirements, that would expressly require partnerships or other persons that have items of income, loss, or deduction reported on the Schedule K-1 from more than one activity that may be subject to limitation under Code Sec. 465 at the partner level to report certain additional information separately for each activity on an attachment to a partner’s Schedule K-1. The new paragraph would require the partnership to identify the at-risk activity, the items of income, loss, or deduction for the activity, other items of income, loss, or deduction, partnership liabilities, and any other information that relates to the activity, such as distributions and partner loans. This requirement in the draft instructions for the 2019 Form 1065 is in addition to long-standing at-risk reporting requirements included in the instructions to the Form 1065.

Penalty Relief

Taxpayers who follow the provisions of the notice will not be subject to any penalty, including a penalty under Code Sec. 6722 for failure to furnish correct payee statements, under Code Sec. 6698 for failure to file a partnership return that shows required information, and under Code Sec. 6038 for failure to furnish information required on a Schedule K-1 (Form 8865).

The IRS has released final regulations that present guidance on how certain organizations that provide employee benefits must calculate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) under Code Sec. 512(a).

The IRS has released final regulations that present guidance on how certain organizations that provide employee benefits must calculate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) under Code Sec. 512(a).

Background

Organizations that are otherwise exempt from tax under Code Sec. 501(a) are subject to tax on their unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) under Code Sec. 511(a). Code Sec. 512(a) defines UBTI of exempt organizations and provides special rules for calculating UBTI for organizations described in Code Sec. 501(c)(7) (social and recreational clubs), voluntary employees’ beneficiary associations (VEBAs) described in Code Sec. 501(c)(9) and supplemental unemployment benefit trusts (SUBs) described in Code Sec. 501(c)(17).

Covered Entity

"Covered entity" describes VEBAs and SUBs subject to the UBTI computation rules under Code Sec. 512(a)(3). A corporation is treated as having exempt function income for a taxable year only if it files a consolidated return with the organization described in Code Sec. 501(c)(7), (9), or (17). These final regulations add a clause to clarify that the term "covered entity" includes a corporation described in Code Sec. 501(c)(2) to the extent provided in Code Sec. 512(a)(3)(C).

Nonrecognition of Gain

If a property used directly in the performance of the exempt function of a covered entity is sold by that covered entity, and other property is subsequently purchased and used by the covered entity directly in the performance of its exempt function—at any point within a four-year period beginning one year before the date of the sale and ending three years after the date of sale—gain, if any, from the sale is recognized only to the extent that the sales price of the old property exceeds the covered entity’s cost of purchasing the other property.

Limitation on Amounts Set Aside for Exempt Purposes

The total amount of investment income earned during the year should be considered when calculating whether an excess exists at the end of the year. Any investment income a covered entity earns during the taxable year is subject to unrelated business income tax (UBIT) to the extent the covered entity’s year-end assets exceed the account limit.

Effective Date

The final regulations apply to tax years beginning on or after December 10, 2019.

The IRS has issued Reg. §20.2010-1(c) to address the effect of the temporary increase in the basic exclusion amount (BEA) used in computing estate and gift taxes. In addition, Reg. §20.2010-1(e)(3) is amended to reflect the increased BEA for years 2018-2025 ($10 million, as adjusted for inflation). Further, the IRS has confirmed that taxpayers taking advantage of the increased BEA in effect from 2018 to 2025 will not be adversely affected after 2025 when the exclusion amount is set to decrease to pre-2018 levels.

The IRS has issued Reg. §20.2010-1(c) to address the effect of the temporary increase in the basic exclusion amount (BEA) used in computing estate and gift taxes. In addition, Reg. §20.2010-1(e)(3) is amended to reflect the increased BEA for years 2018-2025 ($10 million, as adjusted for inflation). Further, the IRS has confirmed that taxpayers taking advantage of the increased BEA in effect from 2018 to 2025 will not be adversely affected after 2025 when the exclusion amount is set to decrease to pre-2018 levels.

The regulations apply to estates of decedents dying on and after November 26, 2019.

Special Rule for Post-2025 Decedents

Reg. §20.2010-1(c) provides a special rule in cases where the portion of the credit against the estate tax that is based on the BEA is less than the sum of the credit amounts attributable to the BEA allowable in computing gift tax payable within the meaning of Code Sec. 2001(b)(2). In that situation, the portion of the credit against the net tentative estate tax that is attributable to the BEA is based upon the greater of those two credit amounts.

Inflation-Adjusted Amounts and DSUE Amount

Because the term "BEA" includes the exclusion amount, as adjusted for inflation, the examples in the regulations reflect hypothetical inflated adjusted BEAs. Reg. §20.2010-1(c)(2)(ii), Example 2, illustrates the application of the special rule based on gifts actually made, and would be inapplicable to a decedent who did not make gifts in excess of the date of death BEA, as adjusted for inflation.

Reg. §20.2010-1(c)(2)(iii) and (iv), Examples 3 and 4, illustrate that if a spouse dies during the increased BEA period, and the deceased spouse’s executor makes the portability election, the surviving spouse’s applicable exclusion amount includes the full amount of the deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE) amount based on the deceased spouse’s increased BEA. The DSUE amount is available to reduce the surviving spouse’s transfer tax liability regardless of when transfers are made.

BEA Calculations

The final rules explain how to determine the extent to which a credit allowable in computing gift tax payable is based solely on the BEA. Reg. §20.2010-1(c)(2)(iv), Example 4, addresses the application of the DSUE ordering rule, as well as the computation of the credit based solely on the BEA in a calendar period in which the transfer exhausts the remaining DSUE amount with the result that the BEA is also allowable.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) has released a report on suitability checks for participation in IRS programs. TIGTA initiated this audit to assess the effectiveness of IRS processes to ensure the suitability of applicants seeking to participate in IRS programs and to follow up on IRS planned corrective actions to address prior TIGTA recommendations.

TIGTA Final Audit Report

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) has released a report on suitability checks for participation in IRS programs. TIGTA initiated this audit to assess the effectiveness of IRS processes to ensure the suitability of applicants seeking to participate in IRS programs and to follow up on IRS planned corrective actions to address prior TIGTA recommendations.

Suitability Checks

The IRS’s suitability checks for applicants to the Acceptance Agent, Enrolled Agent, and e-File Provider Programs generally ensured that only reputable individuals were accepted in the programs during fiscal year 2018. Further, the IRS’s continuous suitability checks also ensured that individuals accepted in the programs prior to the initial suitability checks had not engaged in criminal activity warranting removal from the program. TIGTA also identified that when the Federal Bureau of Investigation reported a criminal history for an applicant, the adjudication process was inconsistent depending on the program to which the individual was applying. Finally, the IRS did not take sufficient actions to address the fraudulent submission of fingerprint cards by some applicants to pass their background investigations.

TIGTA Recommendations

TIGTA recommended that the IRS:

• assess the risk to tax administration of performing inconsistent initial and continuous suitability checks on individuals seeking to participate or enrolled in the e-File Provider, Acceptance Agent, and Enrolled Agent Programs;
• assess the risk of the e-File Provider Program’s use of decision matrices to adjudicate an applicant’s criminal history that are inconsistent with the matrices used by the Acceptance Agent and Enrolled Agent Programs; and
• work with the Federal Bureau of Investigation to identify additional individuals who may have submitted fingerprint cards that match the fingerprints of another individual.

The IRS agreed with all the recommendations.

Every year, Americans donate billions of dollars to charity. Many donations are in cash. Others take the form of clothing and household items. With all this money involved, it's inevitable that some abuses occur. The new Pension Protection Act cracks down on abuses by requiring that all donations of clothing and household items be in "good used condition or better."

Good used or better condition

The new law does not define good or better condition. For guidance, you can look to the standards that many charities already have in place. Many charities will not accept your donations of clothing or household items unless they are in good or better condition.

Clothing cannot be torn, soiled or stained. It must be clean and wearable. Many charities will reject a shirt with a torn collar or a jacket with a large tear in a sleeve. As one charity spokesperson summed it up, "Don't donate anything you wouldn't want to wear yourself." 

Household items include furniture, furnishings, electronics, appliances, and linens, and similar items.  Food, paintings, antiques, art, jewelry and collectibles are not household items. Household items must be in working condition. For example, a DVD player that does not work is not in good used or better condition. You can still donate it (if the charity will accept it) but you cannot claim a tax deduction. Household items, particularly furnishings and linens, must be clean and useable. 

The new law authorizes the IRS to deny a deduction for the contribution of a clothing or household item that has minimal monetary value. At the top of this list you can expect to find socks and undergarments, which have had inflated values for years.

Fair market value

You generally can deduct the fair market value of your donation. Unless your donation is new - for example, a blouse that has never been worn - its fair market value is not what you paid for it. Just like when you drive a new car off the dealer's lot, a new item loses value once you wear or use it.  Therefore, its value is less than what you paid for it.  

If you're not sure about an item's value, a reputable charity can help you determine its fair market value. Our office can also help you value your donations of used clothing and household items.

Get a receipt

Generally, you must obtain a receipt for your gift. If obtaining a receipt is impracticable, for example, you drop off clothing at a self-service donation center, you must maintain reliable written information about the contribution, such as the type and value of the property.

Charitable contributions of property of $250 or more must be substantiated by obtaining a contemporaneous written acknowledgement from the charity including an estimate of the value of the items. If your deduction for noncash contributions is greater than $500, you must attach Form 8283 to your tax return. Special rules apply if you are claiming a deduction of more than $5,000.

Exception

In some cases, the new rules about good used or better condition do not apply. The restrictions do not apply if a deduction of more than $500 is claimed for the single clothing or household item and the taxpayer includes an appraisal with his or her return.

If you have any questions about the new charitable contribution rules for donations of clothing and household items, give our office a call. The new rules apply to contributions made after August 17, 2006.

Probably one of the more difficult decisions you will have to make as a consumer is whether to buy or lease your auto. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of buying vs. leasing a new car or truck before you get to the car dealership can ease the decision-making process and may alleviate unpleasant surprises later.

Probably one of the more difficult decisions you will have to make as a consumer is whether to buy or lease your auto. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of buying vs. leasing a new car or truck before you get to the car dealership can ease the decision-making process and may alleviate unpleasant surprises later.

Nearly one-third of all new vehicles (and up to 75% of all new luxury cars) are leased rather than purchased. But the decision to lease or buy must ultimately be made on an individual level, taking into consideration each person's facts and circumstances.

Buying

Advantages.

• You own the car at the end of the loan term.
• Lower insurance premiums.
• No mileage limitations.

Disadvantages.

• Higher upfront costs.
• Higher monthly payments.
• Buyer bears risk of future value decrease.

Leasing

Advantages.

• Lower upfront costs.
• Lower monthly payments.
• Lessor assumes risk of future value decrease.
• Greater purchasing power.
• Potential additional income tax benefits.
• Ease of disposition.

Disadvantages.

• You do not own the car at the end of the lease term, although you may have the option to purchase at that time.
• Higher insurance premiums.
• Potential early lease termination charges.
• Possible additional costs for abnormal wear & tear (determined by lessor).
• Extra charges for mileage in excess of mileage specified in your lease contract.

Before you make the decision whether to lease or buy your next vehicle, it makes sense to ask yourself the following questions:

How long do I plan to keep the vehicle? If you want to keep the car or truck longer than the term of the lease, you may be better off purchasing the vehicle as purchase contracts usually result in a lower overall cost of ownership.

How much am I going to drive the vehicle? If you are an outside salesperson and you drive 30,000 miles per year, any benefits you may have gained upfront by leasing will surely be lost in the end to excess mileage charges. Most lease contracts include mileage of between 12,000-15,000 per year - any miles driven in excess of the limit are subject to some pretty hefty charges.

How expensive of a vehicle do I want? If you can really only afford monthly payments on a Honda Civic but you've got your eye on a Lexus, you may want to consider leasing. Leasing usually results in lower upfront fees in the form of lower down payments and deferred sales tax, in addition to lower monthly payments. This combination can make it easier for you to get into the car of your dreams.

If you have any questions about the tax ramifications regarding buying vs. leasing an automobile or would like some additional information when making your decision, please contact the office.